On 30.11.16 21:21, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 29/11/16 15:09, Artem Mygaiev wrote:
>> Hi Julien
>>
>> On 29.11.16 16:27, Julien Grall wrote:
>>> Hi Artem,
>>>
>>> On 29/11/16 14:21, Artem Mygaiev wrote:
Lars, the project is approved by Coverity. Scan has found some issues in
xen/arch/arm o
On 29/11/16 15:09, Artem Mygaiev wrote:
> Hi Julien
>
> On 29.11.16 16:27, Julien Grall wrote:
>> Hi Artem,
>>
>> On 29/11/16 14:21, Artem Mygaiev wrote:
>>> Lars, the project is approved by Coverity. Scan has found some issues in
>>> xen/arch/arm on master, part of them are false positives.
>> Per
Thank you!
On Wed, 30 Nov 2016, Artem Mygaiev wrote:
> Done
>
>
> On 29.11.16 20:19, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Tue, 29 Nov 2016, Artem Mygaiev wrote:
> >> Hi Julien
> >>
> >> On 29.11.16 16:27, Julien Grall wrote:
> >>> Hi Artem,
> >>>
> >>> On 29/11/16 14:21, Artem Mygaiev wrote:
>
Done
On 29.11.16 20:19, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Nov 2016, Artem Mygaiev wrote:
>> Hi Julien
>>
>> On 29.11.16 16:27, Julien Grall wrote:
>>> Hi Artem,
>>>
>>> On 29/11/16 14:21, Artem Mygaiev wrote:
Lars, the project is approved by Coverity. Scan has found some issues in
Hi Lars
On 29.11.16 17:04, Lars Kurth wrote:
> Please don't post them to xen-devel@ though: as a one-off, you may want to
> send to Julien and maybe Stefano
> Longer term, we ought to find a way to send the output to a safe place, as
> for x86
> Lars
I have added Julien, Stefano and you as membe
On Tue, 29 Nov 2016, Artem Mygaiev wrote:
> Hi Julien
>
> On 29.11.16 16:27, Julien Grall wrote:
> > Hi Artem,
> >
> > On 29/11/16 14:21, Artem Mygaiev wrote:
> >> Lars, the project is approved by Coverity. Scan has found some issues in
> >> xen/arch/arm on master, part of them are false positives
On 29/11/16 15:09, Artem Mygaiev wrote:
Hi Julien
On 29.11.16 16:27, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Artem,
On 29/11/16 14:21, Artem Mygaiev wrote:
Lars, the project is approved by Coverity. Scan has found some issues in
xen/arch/arm on master, part of them are false positives.
Perfect. It would b
Hi Julien
On 29.11.16 16:27, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Artem,
>
> On 29/11/16 14:21, Artem Mygaiev wrote:
>> Lars, the project is approved by Coverity. Scan has found some issues in
>> xen/arch/arm on master, part of them are false positives.
>
> Perfect. It would be interesting to know the list of
Please don't post them to xen-devel@ though: as a one-off, you may want to
send to Julien and maybe Stefano
Longer term, we ought to find a way to send the output to a safe place, as
for x86
Lars
On 29/11/2016 14:27, "Julien Grall" wrote:
>Hi Artem,
>
>On 29/11/16 14:21, Artem Mygaiev wrote:
>>
Hi Artem,
On 29/11/16 14:21, Artem Mygaiev wrote:
Lars, the project is approved by Coverity. Scan has found some issues in
xen/arch/arm on master, part of them are false positives.
Perfect. It would be interesting to know the list of issues so we can
categorize them (i.e are they security iss
Lars, the project is approved by Coverity. Scan has found some issues in
xen/arch/arm on master, part of them are false positives.
On 28.11.16 13:01, Artem Mygaiev wrote:
> On 28.11.16 12:27, Lars Kurth wrote:
>> On 22/11/2016 13:54, "Artem Mygaiev" wrote:
>>> On 22.11.16 15:42, Andrew Cooper wr
On 28.11.16 12:27, Lars Kurth wrote:
> On 22/11/2016 13:54, "Artem Mygaiev" wrote:
>> On 22.11.16 15:42, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> The only way we could scan for ARM is if we could be given multiple
>>> different streams (one per arch) to use, and Coverity have already said
>>> no to this request.
On 22/11/2016 13:54, "Artem Mygaiev" wrote:
>On 22.11.16 15:42, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>
>>
>> The only way we could scan for ARM is if we could be given multiple
>> different streams (one per arch) to use, and Coverity have already said
>> no to this request. This is a politics problem, not a
On 22.11.16 15:42, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 22/11/16 11:55, Lars Kurth wrote:
>> On 22/11/2016 11:51, "Julien Grall" wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Lars,
>>>
>>> On 19/11/16 16:53, Lars Kurth wrote:
On 18/11/2016 20:55, "Julien Grall" wrote:
> Coverity has been proven useful on x86 to catch some bugs
On 22/11/16 11:55, Lars Kurth wrote:
>
> On 22/11/2016 11:51, "Julien Grall" wrote:
>
>> Hi Lars,
>>
>> On 19/11/16 16:53, Lars Kurth wrote:
>>> On 18/11/2016 20:55, "Julien Grall" wrote:
Coverity has been proven useful on x86 to catch some bugs. A such
things
would be nice for ARM
Coverity Scan does static analysis only, but hooks into the build system
in order to track compilation process and build map of source code to
analyze.
In addition to connecting the build process, user of Scan needs to
provide a) filters to specify particular components for analysis and b)
model t
On 22/11/2016 11:51, "Julien Grall" wrote:
>Hi Lars,
>
>On 19/11/16 16:53, Lars Kurth wrote:
>> On 18/11/2016 20:55, "Julien Grall" wrote:
>>>
>>> Coverity has been proven useful on x86 to catch some bugs. A such
>>>things
>>> would be nice for ARM too. Is there anything we can do to get cover
Hi Lars,
On 19/11/16 16:53, Lars Kurth wrote:
On 18/11/2016 20:55, "Julien Grall" wrote:
Coverity has been proven useful on x86 to catch some bugs. A such things
would be nice for ARM too. Is there anything we can do to get coverity
testing ARM? (CC Lars).
Coverity does static code analysis
On 18.11.16 22:55, Julien Grall wrote:
> Coverity has been proven useful on x86 to catch some bugs. A such
> things would be nice for ARM too. Is there anything we can do to get
> coverity testing ARM? (CC Lars).
This is exactly what we want to do - update model files (if needed),
prepare some refe
On 18/11/2016 20:55, "Julien Grall" wrote:
>Hello,
>
>On 18/11/2016 09:28, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 01:56:38PM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> On 18/11/16 13:36, Artem Mygaiev wrote:
Hello
I would like to request access to Coverity Scan project. Her
Hello,
On 18/11/2016 09:28, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 01:56:38PM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 18/11/16 13:36, Artem Mygaiev wrote:
Hello
I would like to request access to Coverity Scan project. Hereby, I:
- agree to follow the security response process.
- undert
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 01:56:38PM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 18/11/16 13:36, Artem Mygaiev wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > I would like to request access to Coverity Scan project. Hereby, I:
> > - agree to follow the security response process.
> > - undertake to report security issues discovered
On 18/11/16 13:36, Artem Mygaiev wrote:
> Hello
>
> I would like to request access to Coverity Scan project. Hereby, I:
> - agree to follow the security response process.
> - undertake to report security issues discovered to the security team
> (secur...@xenproject.org) within 3 days of discovery
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hello
I would like to request access to Coverity Scan project. Hereby, I:
- agree to follow the security response process.
- undertake to report security issues discovered to the security team
(secur...@xenproject.org) within 3 days of discovery.
24 matches
Mail list logo