: [Xen-devel] [BUG] blkback reporting incorrect number of
> sectors, unable to boot
>
> >>> On 10.11.17 at 10:40, wrote:
> >> Anthony PERARD
> >> Sent: 09 November 2017 17:50
> >> The problem is that QEMU 4.10 have a lock on the disk image. When
>
>>> On 10.11.17 at 10:40, wrote:
>> Anthony PERARD
>> Sent: 09 November 2017 17:50
>> The problem is that QEMU 4.10 have a lock on the disk image. When
>> booting an HVM guest with a qdisk backend, the disk is open twice, but
>> can only be locked once, so when the pv disk is been initialized, the
utek Wilk
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [BUG] blkback reporting incorrect number of
> sectors, unable to boot
>
> On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 05:03:18PM +, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 08:15:52AM -0700, Mike Reardon wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 10:03 AM, Roger Pau Monné
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 08:15:52AM -0700, Mike Reardon wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 2:30 AM, Roger Pau Monné
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Please try to avoid top-posting.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 08:27:17PM -0700, Mike Reardon wro
On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 05:03:18PM +, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 08:15:52AM -0700, Mike Reardon wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 2:30 AM, Roger Pau Monné
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Please try to avoid top-posting.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 08:27:17PM -0700, Mike Rea
On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 08:15:52AM -0700, Mike Reardon wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 2:30 AM, Roger Pau Monné
> wrote:
>
> > Please try to avoid top-posting.
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 08:27:17PM -0700, Mike Reardon wrote:
> > > So am I correct in reading this that for at least the foresee
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 2:30 AM, Roger Pau Monné
wrote:
> Please try to avoid top-posting.
>
> On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 08:27:17PM -0700, Mike Reardon wrote:
> > So am I correct in reading this that for at least the foreseeable future
> > storage using 4k sector sizes is not gonna happen? I'm just
[BUG] blkback reporting incorrect number of
> sectors, unable to boot
>
> Please try to avoid top-posting.
>
> On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 08:27:17PM -0700, Mike Reardon wrote:
> > So am I correct in reading this that for at least the foreseeable future
> > storage using 4k se
Please try to avoid top-posting.
On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 08:27:17PM -0700, Mike Reardon wrote:
> So am I correct in reading this that for at least the foreseeable future
> storage using 4k sector sizes is not gonna happen? I'm just trying to
> figure out if I need to get some different hardware.
So am I correct in reading this that for at least the foreseeable future
storage using 4k sector sizes is not gonna happen? I'm just trying to
figure out if I need to get some different hardware.
Thank you!
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 5:41 AM, Roger Pau Monné
wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 04:31:
On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 04:31:06AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 07.11.17 at 11:30, wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 05:33:37AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 04.11.17 at 05:48, wrote:
> >> > I added some additional storage to my server with some native 4k sector
> >> > size disks.
>>> On 07.11.17 at 11:30, wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 05:33:37AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 04.11.17 at 05:48, wrote:
>> > I added some additional storage to my server with some native 4k sector
>> > size disks. The LVM volumes on that array seem to work fine when mounted
>> > by t
[BUG] blkback reporting incorrect number of
> sectors, unable to boot
>
> On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 05:33:37AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > >>> On 04.11.17 at 05:48, wrote:
> > > I added some additional storage to my server with some native 4k sector
> > >
On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 05:33:37AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 04.11.17 at 05:48, wrote:
> > I added some additional storage to my server with some native 4k sector
> > size disks. The LVM volumes on that array seem to work fine when mounted
> > by the host, and when passed through to any
>>> On 04.11.17 at 05:48, wrote:
> I added some additional storage to my server with some native 4k sector
> size disks. The LVM volumes on that array seem to work fine when mounted
> by the host, and when passed through to any of the Linux guests, but
> Windows guests aren't able to use them whe
Hello,
I had originally posted about this issue to win-pv-devel but it was
suggested this is actually an issue in blkback.
I added some additional storage to my server with some native 4k sector
size disks. The LVM volumes on that array seem to work fine when mounted
by the host, and when passed
16 matches
Mail list logo
