On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 11:41 PM, Dario Faggioli
wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 14:32 -0600, suokun wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 4:44 AM, Dario Faggioli
>> wrote:
>
>> Hi, Dario,
>> Thank you for your reply.
>>
> Hi,
>
>> Here are my two V
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 2:11 PM, suokun wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 3:44 AM, George Dunlap wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 5:59 AM, suokun wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> The BOOST mechanism in Xen credit scheduler is designed to prioritize
>>> VM
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 4:44 AM, Dario Faggioli
wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-10-26 at 23:59 -0600, suokun wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
> Hi,
>
> And first of all, thanks for resending in plain text, this is much
> appreciated.
>
> Thanks also for the report. I'm not s
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 3:44 AM, George Dunlap wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 5:59 AM, suokun wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The BOOST mechanism in Xen credit scheduler is designed to prioritize
>> VM which has I/O-intensive application to handle the I/O request in
>
Hi all,
The BOOST mechanism in Xen credit scheduler is designed to prioritize
VM which has I/O-intensive application to handle the I/O request in
time. However, this does not always work as expected.
(1) Problem description
Suppose two VMs(named VM-I/O and VM-CPU
