> Hardware is a SuperMicro X10SAT motherboard
> (http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/Xeon/C220/X10SAT.cfm),
> with AMI v3 BIOS + "UEFI support"
>
> Two issues exist with the SuperMicro EFI
>
> (1) firmware EFI mis-mapping causing Xen PANIC on restart
> (2) EFI variables not persistent ac
Since I'm not a developer I may be peeking my nose a bit too far, but based on
what I know, I think that enabling AHCI by default would be a compatibility
suicide. I'm not sure about Linux and Windows Vista/7/8+, but at least for
Windows XP based VMs, it would be a terrible idea.
Back during W
A year or so ago I had done a near identical guide in spanish, to make
installing Xen more accessible to hispanic people. However, I figured out that
pretty much everyone which was interesed in it, didn't had the proper Hardware
to try Passthrough, and anyone who does, should have no issues unde
>> While I didn't tested a lot, nearly everything seems to be working. The only
>> discovered two issues are:
>> It may be just placebo, but I think that the DomU takes a bit more time
>> while booting, and also after I shut down it from inside. With xl list, I
>> see that it stays around 20 sec
This E-Mail is a followup of the previous one about the regression I had in Xen
4.4 compared to 4.3, here:
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/xen/devel/351336
http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-10/msg01341.html (This one is
missing from the previous link, here I discovered a wor
While I am not a developer myself (I always sucked hard when it comes to read
and write code), there are several capabilities of Xen and its supporting
Software which I'm always interesed in how they progress, more out of curiosity
than anything else. However, usually, documentation seems to bac
.1 vs
> 4.3.2
>
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 04:08:14PM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 03:55:36AM -0300, Zir Blazer wrote:
>>> There is a regression in both PCI and VGA Passthrough in Xen 4.4.1 when
>>> compared to 4.3.2. Due to th
