hi Andrew
>
2. line 125
in hvm mode,would not be a balloon page.
gfn would not be INVALID_MFN.
mfn would be INVALID_MFN.
right?
>>> I don't understand what you asking here.
>> i think those code should delete:
125 /* Likely a ballooned page. */
>> if page is ba
hi Andrew
>On 17/05/16 10:01, Zhang, Chunyu wrote:
>> hi all
>>
>> i have two question about xl migrate
>>
>> write_batch
>> 120 for ( i = 0; i < nr_pfns; ++i )
>> 121 {
>> 122 typ
...@cn.fujitsu.com
------
Zhang Chunyu
Nanjing Fujitsu Nanda Software Tech. Co., Ltd.(FNST)
No. 6 Wenzhu Road, Nanjing, 210012, China
TEL：+86+25-86630566-9566
FUJITSU INTERNAL：7998-9566
FAX：+86+25-83317685
EMail：zhan...@cn.fujitsu.com
-
hi Jan
On 06.05.16 at 08:55, wrote:
>> in p2m_pod_demand_populate
>> i see：
>> p2m_pod_demand_populate
>>- pod_eager_reclaim
>>- pod_eager_record
>>
>> if gfn is pod， will get mfn from pod cache and set entry。
>> but i did not know why call pod_eager_reclaim、pod_eager_record in
>> p
pod_eager_reclaim 、pod_eager_record ？
--
--
A new email address of FJWAN is launched from Apr.1 2007.
The updated address is: zhan...@cn.fujitsu.com
--
Zhang Chunyu
Nanjing Fujitsu Nanda Software Tech. Co., Ltd.(FNST)
No. 6 Wenzhu Road
>On April 29, 2016 5:24 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 29.04.16 at 11:14, wrote:
>> > hi all
>> >
>> > in
>> > - p2m-ept.c
>> > - ept_set_entry
>> >
>> > i see code about iommu,
>> > those code for what?
>
>Maybe Chunyu's question is -- why EPT update is along with IOMMU page table
>upda
; iommu_unmap_page(d, gfn + i);
>> }
>> }
>>
>>
>> --
>> --
>> A new email address of FJWAN is launched from Apr.1 2007.
>> The updated address is: zhan...@cn.fujitsu.com
>> --
>> Z
rder); i++ )
iommu_unmap_page(d, gfn + i);
}
}
--
--
A new email address of FJWAN is launched from Apr.1 2007.
The updated address is: zhan...@cn.fujitsu.com
------
Zhang Chunyu
Nanjing Fujitsu
hi george
>Please don't cross-post unless you need to. These are coding
>questions, so xen-devel is the right place to ask this.
>
>On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 7:58 AM, Zhang, Chunyu wrote:
>>
>> hi all
>>
>> i have two question about ballon.
>>
>&g
delete ?
--
--
A new email address of FJWAN is launched from Apr.1 2007.
The updated address is: zhan...@cn.fujitsu.com
--
Zhang Chunyu
Nanjing Fujitsu Nanda Software Tech. Co., Ltd.(FNST)
No. 6 Wenzhu Road, Nanjing, 210012
[...]
i think p2m_is_ram(t) , ram also from pod cache,
>>>
>>> No, that's memory from the guest's p2m table. The p2m table can have 1G
>> right..
>> sorry , i did not write clearly.
>> i mean: ram come like this:
>> - pod cache is 4K or 2M
>> - ram get from pod cache
>> - set ram to p2m tabl
>On 26/04/16 11:49, Zhang, Chunyu wrote:
>>
>>> On 26/04/16 08:27, zhangcy wrote:
>>>> PoD does not have cache list for 1GB pages.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: zhangcy
>>>
>>> Thanks for the patch. FYI we normally tag t
>On 26/04/16 08:27, zhangcy wrote:
>> PoD does not have cache list for 1GB pages.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: zhangcy
>
>Thanks for the patch. FYI we normally tag the area in the title in a
>structured way; I probably would have used something like the following:
>
>xen/pod: Remove code handling PAGE_
On 26.04.16 at 09:27, wrote:
>> PoD does not have cache list for 1GB pages.
>
>But it might gain support in the future. Is there any harm in this code
>being there?
no harm in this code.
when i read this code, i wonder why order == PAGE_ORDER_1G?
this make me confuse.
i just delete useless c
hi
this may help you。。。
hvm_vcpu_initialise
- .vcpu_initialise = vmx_vcpu_initialise,
- vmx_create_vmcs
- construct_vmcs
- if ( paging_mode_hap(d) )
{
struct p2m_domain *p2m = p2m_get_hostp2m(d);
struct ept_data *ept = &p2m->ept;
15 matches
Mail list logo
