SYM_CODE_END, appropriatelly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner
> Cc: Ingo Molnar
> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin"
> Cc: x...@kernel.org
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki"
> Cc: Len Brown
> Cc: Pavel Machek
> Cc: Boris Ostrovsky
&g
64, given these were
> the last users.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby
> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin"
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner
> Cc: Ingo Molnar
> Cc: x...@kernel.org
> Cc: Herbert Xu
> Cc: "David S. Miller"
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki"
> Cc: L
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 8:11 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> There are ~4300 uses of pr_warn and ~250 uses of the older
> pr_warning in the kernel source tree.
>
> Make the use of pr_warn consistent across all kernel files.
>
> This excludes all files in tools/ as there is a separate
> define pr_warning
On Wednesday, October 12, 2016 01:11:45 PM Juergen Gross wrote:
> When running as Xen dom0 a special processor_aggregator driver is
> needed. Don't register the standard driver in this case.
>
> Without that check an error message:
>
> "Error: Driver 'processor_aggregator' is already registered,
On Wednesday, July 27, 2016 04:18:32 PM Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 4:09 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > The STAO definition document:
> >
> > http://wiki.xenproject.org/mediawiki/images/0/02/Status-override-table.pdf
> >
> > require
On Wednesday, July 27, 2016 07:57:34 PM Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 27/07/16 19:42, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 6:45 AM, David Vrabel wrote:
> >> Shannon Zhao (16):
> >> Xen: ACPI: Hide UART used by Xen
> > So this caused a trivial conflict. No biggie, it wasn't bad and t
On Tuesday, July 12, 2016 02:09:26 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the xen-tip tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/acpi/scan.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 68bdb6773289 ("ACPI: add support for ACPI reconfiguration notifiers")
>
> from the pm tree and commit:
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 8:43 AM, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> Hi Rafael，
>
> Could you please give your comments on this patch? Thanks in advanced!
I was traveling last week, sorry for the slow response.
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http
om0.
>
> CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" (supporter:ACPI)
> CC: Len Brown (supporter:ACPI)
> CC: linux-a...@vger.kernel.org (open list:ACPI)
> Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki
> ---
> drivers/acpi/scan.c | 74
>
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> ACPI 6.0 introduces a new table STAO to list the devices which are used
> by Xen and can't be used by Dom0. On Xen virtual platforms, the physical
> UART is used by Xen. So here it hides UART from Dom0.
>
> CC
om0.
>
> CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" (supporter:ACPI)
> CC: Len Brown (supporter:ACPI)
> CC: linux-a...@vger.kernel.org (open list:ACPI)
> Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao
> ---
> drivers/acpi/scan.c | 69
> +
>
T from Dom0.
>
> CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" (supporter:ACPI)
> CC: Len Brown (supporter:ACPI)
> CC: linux-a...@vger.kernel.org (open list:ACPI)
> Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao
So I said it looked good, but now that I think about it, I have a qu
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> ACPI 6.0 introduces a new table STAO to list the devices which are used
> by Xen and can't be used by Dom0. On Xen virtual platforms, the physical
> UART is used by Xen. So here it hides UART from Dom0.
>
> CC
Dom0.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao
> ---
> CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" (supporter:ACPI)
> CC: Len Brown (supporter:ACPI)
> CC: linux-a...@vger.kernel.org (open list:ACPI)
> ---
> drivers/acpi/scan.c | 63
> +
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Stefano Stabellini
wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Feb 2016, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Thursday, February 11, 2016 04:04:14 PM Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>> > On Wed, 10 Feb 2016, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> > > On Tuesday, Februar
On Thursday, February 11, 2016 04:04:14 PM Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Feb 2016, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday, February 09, 2016 11:19:02 AM Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > On Mon, 8 Feb 2016, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > On Monday, Februar
On Tuesday, February 09, 2016 11:19:02 AM Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Feb 2016, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Monday, February 08, 2016 10:57:01 AM Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > On Sat, 6 Feb 2016, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Feb 5,
On Monday, February 08, 2016 10:57:01 AM Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Feb 2016, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 4:05 AM, Shannon Zhao
> > wrote:
> > > From: Shannon Zhao
> > >
> > > ACPI 6.0 introduces a new table STAO to li
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 4:05 AM, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> From: Shannon Zhao
>
> ACPI 6.0 introduces a new table STAO to list the devices which are used
> by Xen and can't be used by Dom0. On Xen virtual platforms, the physical
> UART is used by Xen. So here it hides UART from Dom0.
>
> Signed-off-by
On Friday, February 05, 2016 09:47:40 AM Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 02:05:37PM +0530, Jayachandran Chandrashekaran Nair
> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > pci_host_acpi.c is a generic implementation of these using a sysdata
> > pointing to acpi_pci_root_info, and using a pointer to
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 12:58 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 04:17:05AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Tuesday, May 26, 2015 03:08:17 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> > On Tuesday, May 26, 2015 01:42:16 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> > > On
On Tuesday, May 26, 2015 10:32:03 AM Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 05/25/2015 10:17 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday, May 26, 2015 03:08:17 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> On Tuesday, May 26, 2015 01:42:16 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>> On Tuesday, May
On Tuesday, May 26, 2015 03:08:17 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 26, 2015 01:42:16 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday, May 26, 2015 01:22:12 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Friday, May 22, 2015 09:53:37 PM Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> > > >
On Tuesday, May 26, 2015 01:42:16 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 26, 2015 01:22:12 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Friday, May 22, 2015 09:53:37 PM Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> > > On 05/22/2015 04:11 AM, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> > > > H
On Tuesday, May 26, 2015 01:22:12 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, May 22, 2015 09:53:37 PM Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> > On 05/22/2015 04:11 AM, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> > > Hello Sander,
> > >
[cut]
> > (+Rafael again)
> >
> > So the
On Friday, May 22, 2015 09:53:37 PM Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 05/22/2015 04:11 AM, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> > Hello Sander,
> >
> > Friday, May 15, 2015, 12:47:27 AM, you wrote:
> >
> >> Sorry for the resend, i messed up the to's en from's.
> >
> >> Hi Konrad / David,
> >
> >> One big snip on
On Wednesday, May 13, 2015 12:52:36 AM Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>
> Tuesday, May 12, 2015, 5:45:06 PM, you wrote:
>
> > On Tuesday, May 12, 2015 02:59:57 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> On Monday, May 11, 2015 11:20:29 AM Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> >> >
On Tuesday, May 12, 2015 02:59:57 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, May 11, 2015 11:20:29 AM Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 12:18:49AM +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> > > Hello Sander,
> > >
> > > Monday, April 27, 2015, 5:48
ports, IRQ sharing enabled
> > > [0.451991] Linux agpgart interface v0.103
> > > [0.452160] Hangcheck: starting hangcheck timer 0.9.1 (tick is 180
> > > seconds, margin is 60 seconds).
> > > [0.45] [drm] Initialized drm 1.1.0 20060810
> > >
> Add pr_fmt and convert one printk(KERN_ERR to pr_err
That is fine by me, so
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki
for the cpuidle and ACPI changes.
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle44xx.c | 7 +++
> arch/arm/mach-tegra/cpuidle-tegra114.c | 4 +
30 matches
Mail list logo
