On Tue, 5 Jan 2016 15:04:43 +0200
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 01:08:52PM +0100, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> > On Tue, 5 Jan 2016 11:30:19 +0200
> > "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 09:13:19
On Tue, 5 Jan 2016 11:30:19 +0200
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 09:13:19AM +0100, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> > On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 22:18:58 +0200
> > "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 02:4
On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 22:18:58 +0200
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 02:45:25PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 09:08:38PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > This defines __smp_xxx barriers for s390,
> > > for use by virtualization.
> > >
> > > Som
On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 22:42:44 +0200
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 04:03:39PM +0100, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> > On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 14:20:42 +0100
> > Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 09:06:30PM +0200, M
On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 14:20:42 +0100
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 09:06:30PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On s390 read_barrier_depends, smp_read_barrier_depends
> > smp_store_mb(), smp_mb__before_atomic and smp_mb__after_atomic match the
> > asm-generic variants exactly. D
