Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/7] Implement Xen PV-IOMMU interface

2016-11-22 Thread Martin Cerveny
Hello. Any update on this ? Thanks, Martin Cerveny On Wed, 10 Feb 2016, Malcolm Crossley wrote: This RFC series implements the PV-IOMMU interface according to the PV-IOMMU design draft D. The PV-IOMMU interface is currently restricted to being used by the hardware domain only as non

Re: [Xen-devel] crash on boot with 4.6.1 on fedora 24

2016-06-02 Thread Martin Cerveny
On Thu, 2 Jun 2016, Martin Cerveny wrote: On Wed, 1 Jun 2016, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: On 06/01/2016 05:01 PM, Martin Cerveny wrote: Hello. On Wed, 1 Jun 2016, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: On 06/01/2016 12:23 PM, Martin Cerveny wrote: :-( On Wed, 1 Jun 2016, Martin Cerveny wrote: I hit

Re: [Xen-devel] crash on boot with 4.6.1 on fedora 24

2016-06-01 Thread Martin Cerveny
On Wed, 1 Jun 2016, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: On 06/01/2016 05:01 PM, Martin Cerveny wrote: Hello. On Wed, 1 Jun 2016, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: On 06/01/2016 12:23 PM, Martin Cerveny wrote: :-( On Wed, 1 Jun 2016, Martin Cerveny wrote: I hit probably the same error with released "XenS

Re: [Xen-devel] crash on boot with 4.6.1 on fedora 24

2016-06-01 Thread Martin Cerveny
Hello. On Wed, 1 Jun 2016, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: On 06/01/2016 12:23 PM, Martin Cerveny wrote: :-( On Wed, 1 Jun 2016, Martin Cerveny wrote: I hit probably the same error with released "XenServer 7.0". - I have Xen4.6.1 (commit d77bac5c064ffb9dbb5b89b55b89853f1b784ebf - update X

Re: [Xen-devel] crash on boot with 4.6.1 on fedora 24

2016-06-01 Thread Martin Cerveny
:-( On Wed, 1 Jun 2016, Martin Cerveny wrote: I hit probably the same error with released "XenServer 7.0". - I have Xen4.6.1 (commit d77bac5c064ffb9dbb5b89b55b89853f1b784ebf - update Xen version to 4.6.1) - XS7 (Dundee) beta3 (kernel-3.10.96-479.383024.x86_64.rpm) work OK - X

Re: [Xen-devel] crash on boot with 4.6.1 on fedora 24

2016-06-01 Thread Martin Cerveny
rpm) crash - patch does not work, arch/x86/xen/mmu.c is very old in 3.10 - Can someone verify error ? Thanks, Martin Cerveny Crash (kernel-3.10.96-479.383024.x86_64.rpm): about to get started... (XEN) d0v0: unhandled page fault (ec=) (XEN) Pagetable walk from 88010278b080: (XEN)

Re: [Xen-devel] Questions about the new usb hotplug code in libxl and about adding hotplug (with qmp) usbredir tcp channels

2016-04-28 Thread Martin Cerveny
On Thu, 28 Apr 2016, Fabio Fantoni wrote: Il 27/04/2016 20:03, Martin Cerveny ha scritto: On Wed, 27 Apr 2016, Fabio Fantoni wrote: Il 27/04/2016 13:26, George Dunlap ha scritto: On 27/04/16 12:02, Fabio Fantoni wrote: Hi, I took a look at the new pvusb hotplug code in libxl to try to

Re: [Xen-devel] Overlaped PIO with multiple ioreq_server (Xen4.6.1)

2016-04-28 Thread Martin Cerveny
Hello. On Thu, 28 Apr 2016, Paul Durrant wrote: -Original Message- From: George Dunlap Sent: 28 April 2016 09:51 To: Martin Cerveny Cc: xen-de...@lists.xensource.com; Paolo Bonzini; Paul Durrant Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Overlaped PIO with multiple ioreq_server (Xen4.6.1) On Wed, Apr

[Xen-devel] Overlaped PIO with multiple ioreq_server (Xen4.6.1)

2016-04-27 Thread Martin Cerveny
) ? Should the IO mapping check overlap between ioreq_servers (but it is probably bad idea) ? Should the qemu IO map only emulated areas (why it needs all ?) ? Any other solution ? Thanks for answers, Martin Cerveny PS: I programmed workaround to select sever with smaller mapped range (attached

Re: [Xen-devel] Questions about the new usb hotplug code in libxl and about adding hotplug (with qmp) usbredir tcp channels

2016-04-27 Thread Martin Cerveny
-vgpu-benchmarks/vdi-click-to-photon-with-raspberry-pi/) I will be very pleased if paravirtualized-usb channel will be created with usb redir protocol in mind. There is problems in qemu "emulation" speed - when usb is remotely attached qemu takes about 20% cpu (probably problem