w,hda,rw' ]
In conf_DomU_Xen:
- you are missing builder="hvm", which means you are using a PV guest
rather than an HVM guest. PV guests tends to be slower on new
hardware.
What version of Xen are you using?
On Tue, 5 Jan 2016, Luca Tongiani wrote:
Sorry but I sent these logs because
hem a built-in or as modules?
On Tue, 5 Jan 2016, Luca Tongiani wrote:
Hi,
thanks in advance for your reply :)
I have attached the following email configuration DomU and the output you have
requested .
Performance disk are all my machines the most serious problem , even if they
are used pow
you won't be able to use the Windows PV drivers which I linked.
Linux has its own set of drivers. Did you enable the Xen PV frontends in
the Linux kernel you use (/var/xen/boot/vmlinuz-4.0.5-gentoo_bmsbackup)?
Did you compile them a built-in or as modules?
On Tue, 5 Jan 2016, Luca Tongiani wrote
the Dom0 .
Thank you in advance Luca
Il 05/01/2016 12:09, Stefano Stabellini ha scritto:
Could you please post your VM config file and the output of
xenstore-ls once the VM has completed the boot sequence?
On Tue, 5 Jan 2016, Luca Tongiani wrote:
Hi Stefano,
im writing to you because im
increase performance, even though
most probably not as much.
Cheers,
Stefano
On Tue, 15 Dec 2015, Luca Tongiani wrote:
Hi to all,
I'm writing you this mail for asking some advice about a great problem i'm
havin in running a Windows VM
(HVM) onto a Xen (Gentoo based) Hypevisor.
I need
vement in IO on disk using VirtIO on a Windows VM
onto a QEMU (QNAP) hypervisor, and i'm tryin to use this feature also on
my Xen HV.
Is VirtIO disk a good way to improve performance?
Thx in advance and hope to keep in touch
--
*Luca Tongiani*
*Sinte* srl
Soluzioni Informatiche e Telematich
