Thanks Julien.
On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Julien Grall
wrote:
> On 03/09/15 17:06, Jintack Lim wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> Hi Jintack,
>
> > On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Ian Campbell > <mailto:ian.campb...@citrix.com>> wrote:
> >
> > On T
On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Jintack Lim
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was trying to set irq affinity by writing a value
> to /proc/irq//smp_affinity,
> but smp_affinity value was not changed at all.
> Ian suggested to take this to the devel list.
> I'm working on Xen4.5
2015-09-03 at 10:59 -0400, Jintack Lim wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > While I was running Apache server,
> > I found that one of Dom0 vcpu is running 100% to handle irqs,
> > and those irqs are set to be processed only on that specific vcpu.
> >
> > Referr
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-02-18 at 10:47 -0500, Jintack Lim wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Ian Campbell
>> wrote:
>> > Dump the register state before panicing so we have some clue where the
>> > issue occur
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Julien Grall wrote:
>
> On 18/02/2015 15:47, Jintack Lim wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Ian Campbell
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Dump the register state before panicing so we have some clue where the
>>>
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> Dump the register state before panicing so we have some clue where the
> issue occurred. Also decode the ESR register a bit to save having to
> grab a pen and paper.
>
> ESR_EL2 is a 32-bit register, so use SYSREG_READ32 not ..._READ64, as
>
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Jintack Lim wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
>>
>> Patch for all this below. Jan, I don't think there is any (possibly
>> historical on x86_32) x86 option we should be trying to be consistent
>> wit
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
>
> Patch for all this below. Jan, I don't think there is any (possibly
> historical on x86_32) x86 option we should be trying to be consistent
> with.
Thanks, Ian.
Your patch works well!
Jintack
_
Hi,
I'm trying to measure number of cycles for hypercalls.
I'm working on ARM v7 and v8.
Xentrace seems to be a right tool to use according to this discussion.
http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2008-10/msg00480.html
However when I ran it on ARM, it gave an error.
The error is the same
I'm sorry, it's my bad.
It was because I didn't do "make clean" before building with
"CONFIG_EARLY_PRINTK=seattle".
Jintack
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 8:49 PM, Jintack Lim wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When I compiled with CONFIG_EARLY_PRINTK=seattle option,
> I
Hi,
When I compiled with CONFIG_EARLY_PRINTK=seattle option,
I got an compile error.
/home/soccertack/dev/xen/xen/arch/arm/built_in.o: In function `early_puts':
/home/soccertack/dev/xen/xen/arch/arm/early_printk.c:22: multiple
definition of `early_puts'
arm64/head.o:/home/soccertack/dev/xen/xen/a
While Xen was booting on Seattle, I got warnings/errors related to smmu and
ccp.
Eventually Seattle was rebooted.
These are the relevant logs (and more warnings in a full log at the bottom).
(XEN) smmu: /smb/motherboard/smmu@00C0: Try to add master ccp
(XEN) smmu: /smb/motherboard/smmu@00C
Hello,
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 8:27 AM, Julien Grall
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 06/01/15 12:50, Jintack Lim wrote:
> > While Xen was booting on Seattle, I got warnings/errors related to smmu
> > and ccp.
> > Eventually Seattle was rebooted.
> > These are the rele
13 matches
Mail list logo
