with
> multiple queues and the driver not clearing all of them.
We can squeeze this into 4.13, pulled.
--
Jens Axboe
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
Fix in Xen-blkfront caused by the re-write in 4.8 time-frame.
> 2) Fix in the xen_biovec_phys_mergeable which allowed guest
> requests when using NVMe - to slurp up more data than allowed
> leading to an XSA (which has been made public today).
gli Zhang (1):
> xen/blkfront: always allocate grants first from per-queue persistent
> grants
>
> Junxiao Bi (1):
> xen-blkfront: fix mq start/stop race
Pulled, thanks.
--
Jens Axboe
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
> [usertype]
> drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c:1628:62: warning: restricted blk_status_t
> degrades to integer
>
> Compile-tested only.
Applied, but I killed your stable tag. Why did you add that?
--
Jens Axboe
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
jens-3.14? Anyway, looks fine, pulled for 4.12.
--
Jens Axboe
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
block: xen-blkback: add null check to avoid null pointer dereference
>
> drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c | 8 +---
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
Pulled, thanks.
--
Jens Axboe
___
Xen-devel mailing lis
fix - to emit an
> uevent whenever the size of the guest disk image changes.
Pulled, thanks.
--
Jens Axboe
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
ndling the XEN_PAGE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE (4KB vs 64KB
> on ARM for example) mishandling while the other is fixing
> the accounting for the configuration changes.
Pulled, thanks.
--
Jens Axboe
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
4KB page
granularity
xen-blkfront: introduce blkif_set_queue_limits()
xen-blkfront: free resources if xlvbd_alloc_gendisk fails
Pulled, thanks.
--
Jens Axboe
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
We can do that, or I can stage them for post initial merge (essentially
my for-linus, which I could base on 4.7-rc7 now). I'm fine with either.
--
Jens Axboe
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
git/konrad/xen.git
stable/for-jens-4.7
which has one fix for migration of guest. We found that if we migrate the
guest from a host that has multi-queue to an older (or vice-versa) we would
lose outstanding I/Os as we did not recreate all the queues properly and lost
the I/Os.
Please pull!
migrating from host that
has multi-queue to one without it (and vice-versa).
Pulled, thanks Konrad.
--
Jens Axboe
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
branch to base them on - but they apply
just fine to for-4.5/drivers, for-linus, and for-4.6/drivers.
Are they 4.5 material or not?
--
Jens Axboe
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
solves an migration problem where the number of queues may differ from
one host to another.
Pulled, thanks.
--
Jens Axboe
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
On 01/13/2016 07:05 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 12:33:29PM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
Hey Jens,
ping ?
Pulled, sorry for the delay, I had some vacation post New Years that I
still haven't caught fully up on.
--
Jens
On 11/30/2015 01:49 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Jens,
On 30/11/2015 20:03, Jens Axboe wrote:
The bisector fingered the commit 578270b "block: fix segment split".
If I reverted this patch on top of 4.4-rc3 and everything seems to
work fine.
Anyone have any ideas?
Can you try my
us' master, or just test it separately.
--
Jens Axboe
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
On 10/07/2015 02:32 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 01:53:01PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 10/07/2015 01:26 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
Hey Jens,
Please git pull an update branch to your 'for-4.3/drivers' branch (which
oddly I don't see does not ha
looking at for-4.3/drivers - this branch is defunct as soon as Linus has
pulled the initial bits for 4.3. After that, for-linus is the branch
that carries fixes for the _current_ branch.
--
Jens Axboe
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
ix yet to go in
for 4.3 from my end :-)
--
Jens Axboe
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
On 08/11/2015 03:45 AM, Rafal Mielniczuk wrote:
On 11/08/15 07:08, Bob Liu wrote:
On 08/10/2015 11:52 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 08/10/2015 05:03 AM, Rafal Mielniczuk wrote:
On 01/07/15 04:03, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 06/30/2015 08:21 AM, Marcus Granado wrote:
Hi,
Our measurements for the
On 08/10/2015 05:03 AM, Rafal Mielniczuk wrote:
On 01/07/15 04:03, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 06/30/2015 08:21 AM, Marcus Granado wrote:
Hi,
Our measurements for the multiqueue patch indicate a clear improvement
in iops when more queues are used.
The measurements were obtained under the following
ce blkfront_gather_backend_features()
xen-blkfront: don't add indirect pages to list when !feature_persistent
xen-blkback: replace work_pending with work_busy in
purge_persistent_gnt()
Pulled, thanks Konrad.
--
Jens Axboe
at all
looks fine.
I would, however, rename blk_mq_queue_rq(). It sounds like a core
function. blkif_queue_rq() would be more appropriate.
Signed-off-by: Arianna Avanzini
Signed-off-by: Bob Liu
Acked-by: Jens Axboe
--
Jens Axboe
___
Xen-deve
y I'd be really interested in the results for the same set of
tests, but without the blk-mq patches. Do you have them, or could you
potentially run them?
--
Jens Axboe
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
sitting in my branch for two weeks - except
the last patch which was a fix and is now part of the branch.
Please git pull at your convience.
Pulled, thanks. But really, should be sent in before the last -rc of the
previous window... Thankfully this isn't that large.
gt;> Signed-off-by: Bob Liu
>>
>> AFAICT since this is basically the same patch as what I've sent:
>>
>> Acked-by: Roger Pau Monné
>>
>
> Hey Jens,
>
> These patches are on top of patches that add this framework in the Xen t
On 02/10/2015 09:10 AM, David Vrabel wrote:
On 10/02/15 15:27, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 02/10/2015 05:58 AM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Jens,
There are 3 fixes for Xen blk drivers. One adds myself as a maintainer
(together with Konrad). There&#
least the week before the merge window opens.
--
Jens Axboe
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
skbs after the block I/O has completed.
Hi Jens,
This xen-blkback change depends on several Xen changes and it would be
easiest if this went via the Xen tree. Are you ok with this?
Yeah, that's fine. You can add my acked-by.
--
Jens Axboe
__
On 12/10/2014 01:57 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> Hey Jens,
>
> These are two fixes for Xen blkfront. They harden how it deals with
> broken backends.
Pulled, thanks.
--
Jens Axboe
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.
31 matches
Mail list logo
