Hi Florian,
On 03/08/17 17:00, Florian Jakobsmeier wrote:
> regarding your previous mails. I was able to single step every instruction
> of my module. The problem (or rather the solution) was to _disable_ the IRQ
> interrupts from within my guest module. This solves the problem of
> singlestepping
Hi Florian,
On 03/08/17 13:29, Florian Jakobsmeier wrote:
> So as far as I understood both of you don't see a general problem with
> (timer) interrupts or the scheduler while being single stepped? Because in
> my opinion after enabling singlestep the system will go into a "spinlock"
> routine.
In
Hi Florian,
On 03/08/17 11:16, Florian Jakobsmeier wrote:
> This is the current version:
I'm not familiar with Xen, so forgive my annotations:
> asmlinkage void leave_hypervisor_tail(void)
>> {
>> +/*This methode will be called after the 'guest_entry' macro in
>> /arch/arm64/entry.S set gue
Hi Florian, Julien,
On 02/08/17 14:32, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 26/07/17 14:12, Florian Jakobsmeier wrote:
>> i was just testing the single step implementation and realized that the
>> before mentioned solution is not fully working. I'm still trying to
>> enable SS for a VM on Xen.
>> To test my
