[Xen-devel] Null scheduler and VM preemption

2017-10-04 Thread Ivan Pavic
Hello, Once assigned to pCPU is vCPU ever preempted using null scheduler? I experimented a little and concluded that it is preempted. Is there a way to avoid preemption? Regards, Ivan Pavic. ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org

Re: [Xen-devel] Possible bug on ARM with irq passthrough

2017-07-05 Thread Ivan Pavic
On 07/05/2017 02:55 PM, Julien Grall wrote: Hi Ivan, On 05/07/17 13:36, Ivan Pavic wrote: On 07/05/2017 01:27 PM, Julien Grall wrote: On 04/07/17 21:20, Ivan Pavić2 wrote: Hello, Hi Ivan, I'm testing IRQ latency on exynos5422. I'm using Xen 4.10-unstable. I used device passt

Re: [Xen-devel] Possible bug on ARM with irq passthrough

2017-07-05 Thread Ivan Pavic
en-devel/2017-02/msg00138.html Regards, Ivan Pavic ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Basic bare metal ARM domain interface

2016-06-06 Thread Ivan Pavic
Hello Julien, On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 11:23:33AM +0100, Julien Grall wrote: > > > On 02/06/16 20:09, Ivan Pavic wrote: > >Hello Julien, > > Hello Ivan, > > >On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 12:41:02PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote: > >> > >>Which compiler

Re: [Xen-devel] Basic bare metal ARM domain interface

2016-06-02 Thread Ivan Pavic
happen with other compiler. Regards, Ivan Pavic ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Basic bare metal ARM domain interface

2016-06-01 Thread Ivan Pavic
12c200 LR: > > > > >r0_usr: r1_usr: deadbeefr2_usr: deadbeef > > >r3_usr: 0000r4_usr: r5_usr: > > >r6_usr: r7_usr: r8_usr: > > >r9_usr: 0064