Re: [Xen-devel] More on kexec/purgatory handover

2015-05-13 Thread Eric W. Biederman
"Jan Beulich" writes: On 13.05.15 at 07:26, wrote: >> The low 640k was weird. We copied it off in purgatory so that it could >> be capture in a dump. The linux kernel itself winds up using that >> memory fundamentally because to fire up subsequent processors you have >> to have memory in

Re: [Xen-devel] More on kexec/purgatory handover

2015-05-12 Thread Eric W. Biederman
Petr Tesarik writes: > Hi all, > > note that I'm not subscribed to the xen-devel mailing list, but Jan > quoted from this mail of Andrew's in SUSE Bugzilla: > >> This is all from a while ago. It is quite possible that we didn't >> actually tested the compatibility case with a 64bit dom0 kernel,