On Sun, 17 Sep 2017 10:49:12 +0800
Yi Sun wrote:
> On 17-09-15 23:12:58, Alexey G wrote:
> > On Thu, 14 Sep 2017 16:39:32 +0800
> > Yi Sun wrote:
> >
> > > Hi, Alexey,
> > >
> > > Have you submitted the patches? If yes, could you please shar
Hi,
On Thu, 14 Sep 2017 16:39:32 +0800
Yi Sun wrote:
> Hi, Alexey,
>
> Have you submitted the patches? If yes, could you please share the link?
Sorry, had a lot of work recently -- so far I've managed to submit only the
bugfix for mentioned xen-mapcache issue with emulated AHCI DMA I/O, which
On Thu, 17 Aug 2017 11:56:06 +0100
Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 17/08/17 09:49, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 16.08.17 at 20:47, wrote:
> >> Hey,
> >>
> >> As per Andrew [Cooper]'s suggestion, writing here instead of #xen on
> >> Freenode.
> >>
> >> I'm trying out Xen (4.9.0) with OVMF (r21243.38
Hi Stefano,
On Mon, 31 Jul 2017 16:39:37 -0700 (PDT)
Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> I noticed that Xen does not boot on Intel Atom E3815. The system is a
> Dell Edge Gateway 3003:
>
> http://i.dell.com/sites/doccontent/shared-content/data-sheets/en/Documents/Dell_Edge_Gateway_3000_Series_spec_shee
On Tue, 25 Jul 2017 15:13:17 +0100
Igor Druzhinin wrote:
> >> The algorithm implemented in hvmloader for that is not complicated and
> >> can be moved to libxl easily. What we can do is to provision a hole big
> >> enough to include all the initially assigned PCI devices. We can also
> >> account
On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 21:39:08 +0100
Igor Druzhinin wrote:
> > But, the problem is that overall MMIO hole(s) requirements are not known
> > exactly at the time the HVM domain being created. Some PCI devices will
> > be emulated, some will be merely passed through and yet there will be
> > some RMRR
On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 18:01:39 +0100
Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 24/07/17 17:42, Alexey G wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 10:53:16 +0100
> > Igor Druzhinin wrote:
> >>> [Zhang, Xiong Y] Thanks for your suggestion.
> >>> Indeed, if
Hi,
On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 10:53:16 +0100
Igor Druzhinin wrote:
> > [Zhang, Xiong Y] Thanks for your suggestion.
> > Indeed, if I set mmi_hole >= 4G - RMRR_Base, this could fix my issue.
> > For this I still have two questions, could you help me ?
> > 1) If hvmloader do low memory relocation, hvmloa
Hi,
On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 08:07:02 +
"Zhang, Xiong Y" wrote:
> [Zhang, Xiong Y] Thanks for your suggestion.
> Indeed, if I set mmi_hole >= 4G - RMRR_Base, this could fix my issue.
> For this I still have two questions, could you help me ?
> 1) If hvmloader do low memory relocation, hvmloader a
> On Fri, 21 Jul 2017 10:57:55 +
> "Zhang, Xiong Y" wrote:
>
> > On an intel skylake machine with upstream qemu, if I add
> > "rdm=strategy=host, policy=strict" to hvm.cfg, win 8.1 DomU couldn't
> > boot up and continues reboot.
> >
> > Steps to reproduce this issue:
> >
> > 1) Boot x
Hi,
On Fri, 21 Jul 2017 10:57:55 +
"Zhang, Xiong Y" wrote:
> On an intel skylake machine with upstream qemu, if I add
> "rdm=strategy=host, policy=strict" to hvm.cfg, win 8.1 DomU couldn't boot
> up and continues reboot.
>
> Steps to reproduce this issue:
>
> 1) Boot xen with iommu=1
On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 11:00:26 -0700 (PDT)
Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> My expectation is that unlocked mappings are much more frequent than
> locked mappings. Also, I expect that only very rarely we'll be able to
> reuse locked mappings. Over the course of a VM lifetime, it seems to me
> that walki
Stefano,
On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 15:17:25 -0700 (PDT)
Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > The patch modifies the behavior in which MapCacheEntry's are added to
> > the list, avoiding duplicates.
>
> I take that the idea is to always go through the whole list to check for
> duplicate locked entries, rig
Under certain circumstances normal xen-mapcache functioning may be broken
by guest's actions. This may lead to either QEMU performing exit() due to
a caught bad pointer (and with QEMU process gone the guest domain simply
appears hung afterwards) or actual use of the incorrect pointer inside
QEMU a
Hi,
> I saw Anthony's patch, but your extension patch seems still in
> development. Do you have plan to upstream it? I'm also interested in
> this basically I want full PCI-e passthru capability (Current Xen does
> support passthru a PCI-e device but guest can't see configuration offset
> 256-4095
Hi,
> >> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 01:55:56PM -0400, Jason Dickens wrote:
> >>> I would like to inquire about q35 support in Xen? As far as I have been
> >>> able to tell, this has not been done? In the Xen version that I've been
> >>> working with (4.4), libxl_dm overrides any "-machine" argument
On Tue, 11 Apr 2017 15:32:09 -0700 (PDT)
Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Apr 2017, hrg wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 3:50 AM, Stefano Stabellini
> > wrote:
> > > On Mon, 10 Apr 2017, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > >> On Mon, 10 Apr 2017, hrg wrote:
> > >> > On Sun, Apr 9, 2017 a
On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 00:36:02 +0800
hrg wrote:
Hi,
> On Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 11:55 PM, hrg wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 11:52 PM, hrg wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> In xen_map_cache_unlocked(), map to guest memory maybe in entry->next
> >> instead of first level entry (if map to rom other than
18 matches
Mail list logo
