Re: [Xen-devel] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 01/46] Replace all occurances of __FUNCTION__ with __func__

Eric Blake writes: > On 11/07/2017 04:12 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote: >> Juan Quintela writes: >> >>> Alistair Francis wrote: Replace all occurs of __FUNCTION__ except for the check in checkpatch with the non GCC specific __func__. > +++ b/audio/audio_int.h @@ -253,7 +

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/hvm: do not register hpet mmio during s3 cycle

>>> On 07.11.17 at 21:39, wrote: > Do it once at domain creation (hpet_init). > > Sleep -> Resume cycles will end up crashing an HVM guest with hpet as > the sequence during resume takes the path: > -> hvm_s3_suspend > -> hpet_reset > -> hpet_deinit > -> hpet_init > -> register_mm

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] xen: Add support for initializing 16550 UART using ACPI

Hi Julien, On 2 November 2017 at 17:45, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi Bhupinder, > > Please write a cover letter even if it is small when your send a series with > multiple patches. > > > On 02/11/17 10:13, Bhupinder Thakur wrote: >> >> Currently, Xen supports only DT based initialization of 16550 UAR

[Xen-devel] Unable to create guest PV domain on OMAP5432

Hello all, I'm trying to implement Xen hypervisor support on OMAP5432.I have followed the steps as in https://wiki.xenproject.org/wiki/Xen_ARM_with_Virtualization_Extensions/OMAP5432_uEVM for the initial setup. I'm able to see the domain 0 successfully up. *root@omap5-evm:~# /etc/init.d/xen

[Xen-devel] [linux-linus test] 115643: regressions - FAIL

flight 115643 linux-linus real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/115643/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-ws16-amd64 17 guest-stop fail REGR. vs. 114682 Tests which are fai

[Xen-devel] [qemu-mainline test] 115649: regressions - FAIL

flight 115649 qemu-mainline real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/115649/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl 18 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail REGR. vs. 114507 test-amd64-i386-l

Re: [Xen-devel] [libvirt] Libvirt config converter can't handle file not ending with new line

On 11/07/2017 08:54 AM, Wim ten Have wrote: On Tue, 7 Nov 2017 12:20:05 + Wei Liu wrote: On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 09:41:01PM -0700, Jim Fehlig wrote: On 10/30/2017 06:17 AM, Wei Liu wrote: Hi Jim I discover a problem when using xen_xl converter. When the file in question doesn't end with

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 115640: regressions - FAIL

flight 115640 xen-unstable real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/115640/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-armhf-armhf-xl-vhd 15 guest-start/debian.repeat fail REGR. vs. 115526 Tests which are fa

[Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/hvm: do not register hpet mmio during s3 cycle

Do it once at domain creation (hpet_init). Sleep -> Resume cycles will end up crashing an HVM guest with hpet as the sequence during resume takes the path: -> hvm_s3_suspend -> hpet_reset -> hpet_deinit -> hpet_init -> register_mmio_handler -> hvm_next_io_handler register_

Re: [Xen-devel] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 01/46] Replace all occurances of __FUNCTION__ with __func__

On 11/07/2017 04:12 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote: > Juan Quintela writes: > >> Alistair Francis wrote: >>> Replace all occurs of __FUNCTION__ except for the check in checkpatch >>> with the non GCC specific __func__. >>> >>> +++ b/audio/audio_int.h >>> @@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ static inline int audio

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v7 2/5] x86/pvclock: add setter for pvclock_pvti_cpu0_va

On 11/06/2017 04:09 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 19/10/2017 15:39, Joao Martins wrote: >> Right now there is only a pvclock_pvti_cpu0_va() which is defined >> on kvmclock since: >> >> commit dac16fba6fc5 >> ("x86/vdso: Get pvclock data from the vvar VMA instead of the fixmap") >> >> The only user

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] aarch64: advertise the GIC system register interface

On 7 November 2017 at 17:57, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Tue, 7 Nov 2017, Peter Maydell wrote: >> I thought about this on the cycle into work this morning, and I >> think that rather than require every board that uses gicv3 >> to set a property on the CPU, we should change the definition >> of

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] aarch64: advertise the GIC system register interface

On Tue, 7 Nov 2017, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 6 November 2017 at 22:16, Stefano Stabellini > wrote: > > When QEMU emulates a GICv3, it needs to advertise the presence of the > > system register interface, which is done via id_aa64pfr0. > > > > To do that, and at the same time to avoid advertising

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable bisection] complete test-amd64-amd64-i386-pvgrub

Hi Wei, On 07/11/17 15:13, Wei Liu wrote: > On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 03:09:07PM +, Julien Grall wrote: >> Hi Wei, >> >> On 06/11/17 14:55, Wei Liu wrote: >>> On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 01:47:56PM +, osstest service owner wrote: branch xen-unstable xenbranch xen-unstable job test

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-next 8/9] xsm: add bodge when compiling with llvm coverage support

>>> On 26.10.17 at 11:19, wrote: > --- a/xen/include/xsm/dummy.h > +++ b/xen/include/xsm/dummy.h > @@ -24,8 +24,22 @@ > * if references remain at link time. > */ > #define LINKER_BUG_ON(x) do { if (x) __xsm_action_mismatch_detected(); } > while (0) > + > +#ifdef CONFIG_LLVM_COVERAGE > +/* >

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-next 3/9] gcov: rename sysctl and functions

>>> On 26.10.17 at 11:19, wrote: > --- a/xen/include/public/sysctl.h > +++ b/xen/include/public/sysctl.h > @@ -646,11 +646,11 @@ struct xen_sysctl_scheduler_op { > > #define XEN_GCOV_FORMAT_MAGIC0x58434f56 /* XCOV */ > > -#define XEN_SYSCTL_GCOV_get_size 0 /* Get total size of output data

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 1/2] VMX: fix VMCS race on context-switch paths

>>> On 07.11.17 at 16:52, wrote: > On 07/11/17 14:55, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 07.11.17 at 15:24, wrote: >>> On 07/11/17 08:07, Jan Beulich wrote: --- unstable.orig/xen/arch/x86/domain.c +++ unstable/xen/arch/x86/domain.c @@ -379,6 +379,14 @@ int vcpu_initialise(struct vcpu *v)

[Xen-devel] [qemu-mainline test] 115635: regressions - FAIL

flight 115635 qemu-mainline real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/115635/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-armhf-libvirt 6 libvirt-buildfail REGR. vs. 114507 Tests which are f

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen PVH support in grub2

On 11/07/2017 02:42 AM, Juergen Gross wrote: > On 06/11/17 17:42, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: >> On 11/06/2017 10:05 AM, Juergen Gross wrote: >>> On 06/11/17 15:51, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: On 11/06/2017 02:16 AM, Juergen Gross wrote: > On 03/11/17 20:00, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: >> On 11/03/20

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC 0/4] TEE mediator framework + OP-TEE mediator

Hi Volodymyr, On 02/11/17 20:07, Volodymyr Babchuk wrote: On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 05:49:12PM +, Julien Grall wrote: On 02/11/17 16:53, Volodymyr Babchuk wrote: On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 01:17:26PM +, Julien Grall wrote: On 24/10/17 20:02, Volodymyr Babchuk wrote: But parameters are map

Re: [Xen-devel] [libvirt] Libvirt config converter can't handle file not ending with new line

On Tue, 7 Nov 2017 12:20:05 + Wei Liu wrote: > On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 09:41:01PM -0700, Jim Fehlig wrote: > > On 10/30/2017 06:17 AM, Wei Liu wrote: > > > Hi Jim > > > > > > I discover a problem when using xen_xl converter. When the file in > > > question doesn't end with a new line, I ge

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 1/2] VMX: fix VMCS race on context-switch paths

On 07/11/17 14:55, Jan Beulich wrote: On 07.11.17 at 15:24, wrote: >> On 07/11/17 08:07, Jan Beulich wrote: >>> --- unstable.orig/xen/arch/x86/domain.c >>> +++ unstable/xen/arch/x86/domain.c >>> @@ -379,6 +379,14 @@ int vcpu_initialise(struct vcpu *v) >>> >>> void vcpu_destroy(struct vcpu

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 1/2] VMX: fix VMCS race on context-switch paths

>>> On 07.11.17 at 09:07, wrote: On 02.11.17 at 20:46, wrote: >>> Any ideas about the root cause of the fault and suggestions how to >>> reproduce > it >>> would be welcome. Does this crash really has something to do with PML? I > doubt >>> because the original environment may hardly be c

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable bisection] complete test-amd64-amd64-i386-pvgrub

On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 03:09:07PM +, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi Wei, > > On 06/11/17 14:55, Wei Liu wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 01:47:56PM +, osstest service owner wrote: > > > branch xen-unstable > > > xenbranch xen-unstable > > > job test-amd64-amd64-i386-pvgrub > > > testid guest-

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable bisection] complete test-amd64-amd64-i386-pvgrub

Hi Wei, On 06/11/17 14:55, Wei Liu wrote: On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 01:47:56PM +, osstest service owner wrote: branch xen-unstable xenbranch xen-unstable job test-amd64-amd64-i386-pvgrub testid guest-start Tree: linux git://xenbits.xen.org/linux-pvops.git Tree: linuxfirmware git://xenbits.xe

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 1/2] VMX: fix VMCS race on context-switch paths

>>> On 07.11.17 at 15:24, wrote: > On 07/11/17 08:07, Jan Beulich wrote: >> --- unstable.orig/xen/arch/x86/domain.c >> +++ unstable/xen/arch/x86/domain.c >> @@ -379,6 +379,14 @@ int vcpu_initialise(struct vcpu *v) >> >> void vcpu_destroy(struct vcpu *v) >> { >> +/* >> + * Flush all sta

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen PVH support in grub2

On 06/11/17 12:36, Juergen Gross wrote: > On 03/11/17 13:17, Roger Pau Monné wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 01:00:46PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote: >>> On 29/09/17 17:51, Roger Pau Monné wrote: On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 03:33:58PM +, Juergen Gross wrote: > On 29/09/17 17:24, Roger Pau

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable-smoke test] 115645: tolerable all pass - PUSHED

flight 115645 xen-unstable-smoke real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/115645/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 13 migrate-support-checkfail never pass test-armhf-armhf-xl 1

Re: [Xen-devel] [libvirt test] 115636: regressions - FAIL

On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 12:59:31PM +, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 12:42:59PM +, osstest service owner wrote: > > flight 115636 libvirt real [real] > > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/115636/ > > > > Regressions :-( > > > > Tests which did not succeed

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Xen/pciback: Implement PCI slot or bus reset with 'do_flr' SysFS attribute

>>> On 06.11.17 at 18:48, wrote: > --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-pciback > +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-pciback > @@ -11,3 +11,15 @@ Description: > #echo 00:19.0-E0:2:FF > /sys/bus/pci/drivers/pciback/quirks > will allow the guest to

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 1/2] VMX: fix VMCS race on context-switch paths

On 07/11/17 08:07, Jan Beulich wrote: On 02.11.17 at 20:46, wrote: >>> Any ideas about the root cause of the fault and suggestions how to >>> reproduce it >>> would be welcome. Does this crash really has something to do with PML? I >>> doubt >>> because the original environment may hardly b

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.10] gcov: return EOPNOTSUPP for unimplemented gcov domctl

>>> On 07.11.17 at 13:31, wrote: > ENOSYS should only be used by unimplemented top-level syscalls. Use > EOPNOTSUPP instead. > > Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné > Reported-by: Jan Beulich Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-deve

[Xen-devel] [distros-debian-snapshot test] 72430: tolerable FAIL

flight 72430 distros-debian-snapshot real [real] http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/72430/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-amd64-i386-amd64-weekly-netinst-pygrub 10 debian-di-install fail like 72400 test-amd64-amd64-amd

Re: [Xen-devel] [libvirt test] 115636: regressions - FAIL

On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 12:42:59PM +, osstest service owner wrote: > flight 115636 libvirt real [real] > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/115636/ > > Regressions :-( > > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, > including tests which could not be run: > test-amd64-i386-

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] aarch64: advertise the GIC system register interface

On 6 November 2017 at 22:16, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > When QEMU emulates a GICv3, it needs to advertise the presence of the > system register interface, which is done via id_aa64pfr0. > > To do that, and at the same time to avoid advertising the presence of > the system register interface when

[Xen-devel] [libvirt test] 115636: regressions - FAIL

flight 115636 libvirt real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/115636/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-libvirt-qcow2 17 guest-start/debian.repeat fail REGR. vs. 115476 Tests which did not

Re: [Xen-devel] [BUG] blkback reporting incorrect number of sectors, unable to boot

On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 04:31:06AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 07.11.17 at 11:30, wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 05:33:37AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> >>> On 04.11.17 at 05:48, wrote: > >> > I added some additional storage to my server with some native 4k sector > >> > size disks.

[Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.10] gcov: return EOPNOTSUPP for unimplemented gcov domctl

ENOSYS should only be used by unimplemented top-level syscalls. Use EOPNOTSUPP instead. Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné Reported-by: Jan Beulich --- Cc: Andrew Cooper Cc: George Dunlap Cc: Ian Jackson Cc: Jan Beulich Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Cc: Stefano Stabellini Cc: Tim Deegan Cc: Wei L

Re: [Xen-devel] Libvirt config converter can't handle file not ending with new line

On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 09:41:01PM -0700, Jim Fehlig wrote: > On 10/30/2017 06:17 AM, Wei Liu wrote: > > Hi Jim > > > > I discover a problem when using xen_xl converter. When the file in > > question doesn't end with a new line, I get the following error: > > > >error: configuration file synt

Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-4.9 test] 115504: regressions - FAIL

On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 08:21:31PM +, osstest service owner wrote: > flight 115504 linux-4.9 real [real] > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/115504/ > > Regressions :-( > > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, > including tests which could not be run: > test-amd64-amd

[Xen-devel] [linux-linus test] 115628: regressions - FAIL

flight 115628 linux-linus real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/115628/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-ws16-amd64 17 guest-stop fail REGR. vs. 114682 Tests which did not

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-next 1/9] gcov: return ENOSYS for unimplemented gcov domctl

On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 09:41:58AM +, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > > Okay, so EOPNOTSUPP is it then, which is also my preference > > (due to there being so many uses of EINVAL elsewhere). I've > > merely mentioned that EINVAL would be suitable since, > > technically speaking, the value in a "sub-op

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC 3/8] libxl: add backend_features to libxl_device_disk

On 11/07/2017 11:28 AM, Oleksandr Grytsov wrote: > On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 8:06 PM, Joao Martins > wrote: > > The function libxl__device_generic_add will have an additional > argument whereby it adds a second set of entries visible to the > backend o

Re: [Xen-devel] [BUG] blkback reporting incorrect number of sectors, unable to boot

>>> On 07.11.17 at 11:30, wrote: > On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 05:33:37AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote: >> >>> On 04.11.17 at 05:48, wrote: >> > I added some additional storage to my server with some native 4k sector >> > size disks. The LVM volumes on that array seem to work fine when mounted >> > by t

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC 3/8] libxl: add backend_features to libxl_device_disk

On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 8:06 PM, Joao Martins wrote: > The function libxl__device_generic_add will have an additional > argument whereby it adds a second set of entries visible to the > backend only. These entries will then be used for devices > thus overriding backend maximum feature set with thi

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Xen/pciback: Implement PCI slot or bus reset with 'do_flr' SysFS attribute

On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 12:48:42PM -0500, Govinda Tatti wrote: > The life-cycle of a PCI device in Xen pciback is complex and is constrained > by the generic PCI locking mechanism. > > - It starts with the device being bound to us, for which we do a function > reset (done via SysFS so the PCI lo

Re: [Xen-devel] [BUG] blkback reporting incorrect number of sectors, unable to boot

> -Original Message- > From: Xen-devel [mailto:xen-devel-boun...@lists.xen.org] On Behalf Of > Roger Pau Monné > Sent: 07 November 2017 10:30 > To: Jan Beulich > Cc: Mike Reardon ; xen-devel@lists.xen.org; Konrad > Rzeszutek Wilk > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [BUG] blkback reporting incorrec

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v3] xen-disk: use an IOThread per instance

This patch allocates an IOThread object for each xen_disk instance and sets the AIO context appropriately on connect. This allows processing of I/O to proceed in parallel. The patch also adds tracepoints into xen_disk to make it possible to follow the state transtions of an instance in the log. S

Re: [Xen-devel] [BUG] blkback reporting incorrect number of sectors, unable to boot

On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 05:33:37AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 04.11.17 at 05:48, wrote: > > I added some additional storage to my server with some native 4k sector > > size disks. The LVM volumes on that array seem to work fine when mounted > > by the host, and when passed through to any

Re: [Xen-devel] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 01/46] Replace all occurances of __FUNCTION__ with __func__

Juan Quintela writes: > Alistair Francis wrote: >> Replace all occurs of __FUNCTION__ except for the check in checkpatch >> with the non GCC specific __func__. >> >> One line in hcd-musb.c was manually tweaked to pass checkpatch. >> >> Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis >> Cc: Gerd Hoffmann >> Cc

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/cpuid: Enable new SSE/AVX/AVX512 cpu features

>>> On 07.11.17 at 10:34, wrote: > My understanding is i need to implement x86 emulator for legacy and VEX > CPU features(GFNI,VAES and VPCLMULQDQ), right? Yes. > As for this patch, whether it is suitable for merge into Xen upstream > this time? At this time no in any event - the tre

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-next 1/9] gcov: return ENOSYS for unimplemented gcov domctl

On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 05:06:18AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 06.11.17 at 12:16, wrote: > > Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [PATCH for-next 1/9] gcov: return ENOSYS for > > unimplemented gcov domctl"): > >> On 26.10.17 at 11:19, wrote: > >> > --- a/xen/common/gcov/gcov.c > >> > +++ b/xen/common

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/cpuid: Enable new SSE/AVX/AVX512 cpu features

On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 01:11:02AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 07.11.17 at 07:28, wrote: > > For those new instructions, you mean i also need to support those > > three instructions(GFNI,VAES and VPCLMULQDQ) in x86_emulate() in PV? > > Why three instructions? And why PV? I'm afraid I

Re: [Xen-devel] [BUG] win2008 guest cannot get ip through sriov

On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 01:04:56AM +, Hao, Xudong wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Roger Pau Monné [mailto:roger@citrix.com] > > Sent: Friday, November 3, 2017 7:23 PM > > To: Hao, Xudong > > Cc: Julien Grall ; Stefano Stabellini > > ; Lars Kurth ; Quan Xu > > ; Kang, Luwei

Re: [Xen-devel] [BUG] xen-mceinj tool testing cause dom0 crash

>>> On 07.11.17 at 09:23, wrote: >> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, November 7, 2017 4:09 PM >> >>> On 07.11.17 at 02:37, wrote: >> >> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com] >> >> Sent: Monday, November 6, 2017 5:17 PM >> >> >>> On 03.11.17 at 09:29, wrote: >

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 115624: regressions - FAIL

flight 115624 xen-unstable real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/115624/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 16 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail REGR. vs. 115526 test-armhf-

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/cpuid: Enable new SSE/AVX/AVX512 cpu features

>>> On 07.11.17 at 07:28, wrote: > For those new instructions, you mean i also need to support those > three instructions(GFNI,VAES and VPCLMULQDQ) in x86_emulate() in PV? Why three instructions? And why PV? I'm afraid I'm confused, and hence I'm afraid simply saying "yes" to your question

Re: [Xen-devel] [BUG] xen-mceinj tool testing cause dom0 crash

>>> On 07.11.17 at 02:37, wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com] >> Sent: Monday, November 6, 2017 5:17 PM >> To: Hao, Xudong >> Cc: Julien Grall ; George Dunlap >> ; Lars Kurth ; Zhang, >> Haozhong ; xen-devel@lists.xen.org >> Subject: RE: [Xen-dev

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 1/2] VMX: fix VMCS race on context-switch paths

>>> On 02.11.17 at 20:46, wrote: >> Any ideas about the root cause of the fault and suggestions how to reproduce >> it >> would be welcome. Does this crash really has something to do with PML? I >> doubt >> because the original environment may hardly be called PML-heavy. Well, PML-heaviness doe