>>> On 22.09.17 at 19:38, wrote:
> On 22/09/17 10:07, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> Therefore all write attempts should produce #GP, just like on real
>> hardware.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
>
> Sergey has already posted a patch series to fix this.
>
> What is the benefit of this version? As far
>>> On 22.09.17 at 19:05, wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 03:07:44AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> Therefore all write attempts should produce #GP, just like on real
>> hardware.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
>>
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
>> @@ -3
flight 113808 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/113808/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
ovmf e921f58d44587c77b843a6332b43f171a44b76cb
baseline version:
ovmf 79777358cd5dbdbb267eb
On Jo, 2017-09-21 at 06:44 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > On 21.09.17 at 10:57, wrote:
> > > From: Petre Pircalabu [mailto:ppircal...@bitdefender.com]
> > > Sent: 21 September 2017 06:12
> > > --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/realmode.c
> > > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/realmode.c
>
flight 113804 linux-linus real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/113804/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 16 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail REGR. vs.
113765
Regressions w
This run is configured for baseline tests only.
flight 72152 ovmf real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/72152/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
ovmf 79777358cd5dbdbb267ebd02405584321292f06a
baseline v
Hi Andre,
On 9/22/2017 7:42 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
Hi Manish,
On 11/09/17 22:33, mja...@caviumnetworks.com wrote:
From: Manish Jaggi
The set is divided into two patches. First one calculates the size of IORT
while second one writes the IORT table itself.
It would be good if you could giv
This run is configured for baseline tests only.
flight 72151 ovmf real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/72151/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
ovmf 5b7c22450591a9e20ff54b970c11087ccfff563d
baseline v
flight 113806 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/113806/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
ovmf 79777358cd5dbdbb267ebd02405584321292f06a
baseline version:
ovmf 5b7c22450591a9e20ff54
flight 113800 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/113800/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 18 guest-start/win.repeat fail in 113791
REGR. vs. 113387
Te
flight 113801 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/113801/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
ovmf 5b7c22450591a9e20ff54b970c11087ccfff563d
baseline version:
ovmf fc8be1ad9ab310b1c7752
Hi!
> > We do need to consider how we want modules to fit into whatever model we
> > choose, though. They can be adjacent, or we could go with a more
> > traditional dynamic link model where the modules can be separate, and
> > chained together with the main kernel via the GOT.
>
> So I believe
flight 113796 linux-linus real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/113796/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i386-xsm6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 113765
build-armhf
This run is configured for baseline tests only.
flight 72150 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/72150/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 16 guest-l
flight 113798 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/113798/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 16 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail REGR. vs.
113767
version targeted fo
flight 113791 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/113791/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 18 guest-start/win.repeat fail REGR. vs.
113387
test-amd64-i
flight 113784 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/113784/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
test-armhf-armhf-xl-cubietruck 6 xen-installfail in 113780 pass in 113784
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-a
flight 113783 linux-linus real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/113783/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-armhf 6 xen-build fail in 113779 REGR. vs. 113765
Tests which are fai
flight 113792 xen-unstable-coverity real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/113792/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
xen 7ff9661b904a3af618dc2a2b8cdec46be6930308
baseline version:
xen 64cf
23.09.2017 19:05, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> 28.06.2017 01:04, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>> Rather than constructing a local structure instance on the stack, fill
>> the fields directly on the shared ring, just like other (Linux)
>> backends do. Build on the fact that all response structure flavors a
flight 113781 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/113781/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 18 guest-start/win.repeat fail REGR. vs.
113387
Tests which
21 matches
Mail list logo
