>>> On 09.06.17 at 22:55, wrote:
> On 06/09/2017 11:22 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 19.05.17 at 17:50, wrote:
>>> @@ -734,8 +735,15 @@ static struct page_info *get_free_buddy(unsigned int
>>> +if ( test_bit(_PGC_need_scrub, &pg[i].count_info) )
>>> +{
>>> +if ( nee
>>> On 09.06.17 at 22:07, wrote:
> On 06/09/2017 10:50 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 19.05.17 at 17:50, wrote:
>>> +unsigned int first_dirty;
>> On x86 this change is fine at present, albeit not optimal. Its ARM
>> equivalent, however, grows struct page_info in the 32-bit case,
>
>
>>> On 09.06.17 at 20:45, wrote:
> On 09/06/17 13:44, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> Use a single macro to define both read and write inline functions.
>> Avoid redundant inputs (including quotes - use stringification
>> instead). Generalize "add" to ease eventual addition of other
>> artihmetic operations
>>> On 09.06.17 at 19:38, wrote:
> On 08/06/17 16:30, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> For PV domains paging_mode_{refcounts,translate}() are always false as
>> of commits 4045953527 ("x86/paging: Enforce PG_external == PG_translate
>> == PG_refcounts") and 92942fd3d4 ("x86/mm: drop
>> guest_{map,get_eff}_l1
>>> On 09.06.17 at 19:50, wrote:
> On 08/06/17 16:49, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> Drop a redundant input constraint, correct a comment, and (re)move
>> fix.insn_bytes adjustments (these aren't needed for custom stub
>> invocations when the instruction placed in the stub can't raise #XF)
>
> I'm not sur
On 08/06/17 23:00, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> Bringing in Konrad because...
>
> On Thu, 2017-06-08 at 11:37 +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 07/06/17 20:19, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>>> On Wed, 7 Jun 2017, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 06/06/17 21:08, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>
> 2) PV susp
This run is configured for baseline tests only.
flight 71544 linux-3.18 real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/71544/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 15 guest-loc
On 6/9/2017 11:11 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
Hi,
Hi Andre,
Tested this patchset + my acpi ITS patch
(https://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2017-06/msg00716.html) on
our platform and it works.
With v10 was not able to get interrupts. v9 was booting ok.
WBR
-Manish
fixes to v10, with
flight 110301 xen-4.7-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/110301/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i3865 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 109620
build-i386-xsm
Hello,
I think it would be beneficial to add local disk migration feature for
‘blkback' backend since it is one of the mostly used backends. I would like
to start a discussion about the design of the machinery needed to achieve
this feature.
===
Objective
Add a feature to
This run is configured for baseline tests only.
flight 71543 xen-unstable real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/71543/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 6 xen-boo
flight 110295 xen-4.8-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/110295/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
test-amd64-amd64-xl 5 xen-install fail in 110182 pass in 110295
test-armhf-armhf-xl-arndale
** Delivery incomplete **
There was a temporary problem delivering your message to
curtiskwo...@gmail.com. Gmail will retry for 47 more hours. You'll be notified
if the delivery fails permanently.
The response was:
Receive rate too high
Reporting-MTA: dns; googlemail.com
Received-From-MTA:
branch xen-4.7-testing
xenbranch xen-4.7-testing
job build-i386
testid xen-build
Tree: qemuu git://xenbits.xen.org/qemu-xen.git
Tree: xen git://xenbits.xen.org/xen.git
*** Found and reproduced problem changeset ***
Bug is in tree: xen git://xenbits.xen.org/xen.git
Bug introduced: 164c34dd2
flight 110288 linux-linus real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/110288/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64 6 xen-bootfail REGR. vs. 110093
test-amd64-amd64-xl
flight 110268 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/110268/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qcow210 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 109975
test-amd64-amd64-
flight 110266 linux-4.9 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/110266/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2 6 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 107358
Tests which are faili
This run is configured for baseline tests only.
flight 71542 ovmf real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/71542/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
build-amd64-libvirt 5 libvirt-buildfai
This run is configured for baseline tests only.
flight 71541 xen-4.6-testing real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/71541/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-320 xtf/test-hvm32-
branch xen-4.7-testing
xenbranch xen-4.7-testing
job build-amd64
testid xen-build
Tree: qemuu git://xenbits.xen.org/qemu-xen.git
Tree: xen git://xenbits.xen.org/xen.git
*** Found and reproduced problem changeset ***
Bug is in tree: xen git://xenbits.xen.org/xen.git
Bug introduced: 164c34dd
flight 110264 linux-3.18 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/110264/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 15 guest-localmigrate/x10
fail in 110189 pass in 110264
tes
** Delivery incomplete **
There was a temporary problem delivering your message to
curtiskwo...@gmail.com. Gmail will retry for 23 more hours. You'll be notified
if the delivery fails permanently.
Reporting-MTA: dns; googlemail.com
Received-From-MTA: dns; FWD-737QHYSMHVAYQAUCAOIQBDAAGAQLMA2Y
** Delivery incomplete **
There was a temporary problem delivering your message to
curtiskwo...@gmail.com. Gmail will retry for 23 more hours. You'll be notified
if the delivery fails permanently.
The response was:
Receive rate too high
Reporting-MTA: dns; googlemail.com
Received-From-MTA:
flight 110262 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/110262/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 17 guest-start/win.repeat fail blocked in
110186
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win7
On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 01:12:10PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 06/09/2017 10:16 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > If we have a large amount of livepatches and want to print them
> > on the console using 'xl debug-keys x' we eventually hit
> > the preemption check:
> >
> > if ( i && !(i
flight 110306 xen-unstable-coverity real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/110306/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
xen aeef64107afca9c6c0428b2cb26a3ba599b3ed75
baseline version:
xen 3d20
flight 110263 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/110263/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
ovmf ec4910cd3336565fdb61dafdd9ec4ae7a6160ba3
baseline version:
ovmf 8f98c76f992be0d22cafa
flight 110249 xen-4.6-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/110249/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
test-armhf-armhf-xl-xsm 5 xen-install fail in 110183 pass in 110249
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-1 45 x
28 matches
Mail list logo
