[Xen-devel] [xen-4.7-testing test] 107283: regressions - trouble: blocked/broken/fail/pass

flight 107283 xen-4.7-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/107283/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-armhf-armhf-xl-arndale 2 hosts-allocate broken REGR. vs. 107233 test-amd64-amd6

[Xen-devel] [qemu-mainline test] 107277: regressions - trouble: blocked/broken/fail/pass

flight 107277 qemu-mainline real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/107277/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-armhf-armhf-xl-arndale 2 hosts-allocate broken REGR. vs. 107219 test-amd64-i386-x

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC] x86/emulate: implement hvmemul_cmpxchg() with an actual CMPXCHG

On 04/03/2017 09:36 PM, Razvan Cojocaru wrote: > On 04/03/2017 09:20 PM, Razvan Cojocaru wrote: >> On 04/01/2017 07:56 PM, Razvan Cojocaru wrote: >>> On 03/31/2017 06:04 PM, Jan Beulich wrote: >>> On 31.03.17 at 17:01, wrote: > On 03/31/2017 05:46 PM, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 31.03.

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 107275: regressions - trouble: blocked/broken/fail/pass

flight 107275 xen-unstable real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/107275/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-armhf-armhf-xl-arndale 2 hosts-allocate broken REGR. vs. 107247 build-armhf-xsm

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen Code Review Dashboard

Oooops. I think I missed your message. Sorry about that. Please, let me know about your ideas. In any case, in other messages about the matter, to this mailing list, you can also find some more details. Important notice: please have in mind that the project is more about Python, ElasticSearch and

[Xen-devel] [linux-4.9 test] 107272: regressions - trouble: broken/fail/pass

flight 107272 linux-4.9 real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/107272/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-armhf-armhf-xl-arndale 2 hosts-allocate broken REGR. vs. 107238 test-arm64-arm64-xl-x

[Xen-devel] [linux-next test] 107268: regressions - trouble: broken/fail/pass

flight 107268 linux-next real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/107268/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-armhf-armhf-xl-arndale 2 hosts-allocate broken REGR. vs. 107221 test-amd64-amd64-xl-

Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-arm-xen test] 107256: trouble: broken/pass

On 04/08/2017 06:48 PM, Julien Grall wrote: Hi, On 04/08/2017 07:58 AM, osstest service owner wrote: flight 107256 linux-arm-xen real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/107256/ Failures and problems with tests :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including

Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-arm-xen test] 107256: trouble: broken/pass

Hi, On 04/08/2017 07:58 AM, osstest service owner wrote: flight 107256 linux-arm-xen real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/107256/ Failures and problems with tests :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-armhf-armhf

Re: [Xen-devel] Outreachy project - Xen Code Review Dashboard

On Fri, 2017-04-07 at 15:49 -0700, Heather Booker wrote: > Hi Jesus,  > > Thanks for your reply! > > So about the task, instructions say after analyzing mboxes with > Perceval to > "store the resulting raw index in ElasticSearch" - what does raw > index mean? In this context, I mean "storing the

[Xen-devel] [xen-4.6-testing test] 107265: regressions - trouble: broken/fail/pass

flight 107265 xen-4.6-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/107265/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-armhf-armhf-xl-arndale 2 hosts-allocate broken REGR. vs. 107208 build-armhf-pvo

[Xen-devel] [ovmf baseline-only test] 71165: all pass

This run is configured for baseline tests only. flight 71165 ovmf real [real] http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/71165/ Perfect :-) All tests in this flight passed as required version targeted for testing: ovmf 59a36f21ac2b4d5e402096a65226e102e8398f45 baseline v

[Xen-devel] [distros-debian-stretch test] 71164: tolerable trouble: blocked/broken/fail/pass

flight 71164 distros-debian-stretch real [real] http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/71164/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): test-armhf-armhf-armhf-stretch-netboot-pygrub 9 debian-di-install fail like 71137 test-amd64-

[Xen-devel] [ovmf test] 107270: all pass - PUSHED

flight 107270 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/107270/ Perfect :-) All tests in this flight passed as required version targeted for testing: ovmf 59a36f21ac2b4d5e402096a65226e102e8398f45 baseline version: ovmf cb811673c765b1bdb2e88

[Xen-devel] [xen-4.4-testing test] 107260: regressions - trouble: blocked/broken/fail/pass

flight 107260 xen-4.4-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/107260/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 15 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail REGR. vs. 106822 test-armhf

[Xen-devel] [libvirt test] 107262: regressions - FAIL

flight 107262 libvirt real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/107262/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-xsm 15 guest-start/debian.repeat fail REGR. vs. 106829 Regressions which are