>>> On 19.12.16 at 02:14, wrote:
> c/s 08fac63 misused v->domain-arch.paging.gfn_bits as the width of
> guest physical address and missed adding PAGE_SHIFT to it when
> checking vmxon operand.
>
> Signed-off-by: Haozhong Zhang
Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich
>>> On 16.12.16 at 18:38, wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 09:48:32AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 30.11.16 at 17:49, wrote:
>> > @@ -545,11 +552,12 @@ static __init void pvh_map_all_iomem(struct domain
>> > *d, unsigned long nr_pages)
>> > ASSERT(nr_holes == 0);
>> > }
>> >
>> >
>>> On 16.12.16 at 18:57, wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 09:17:01AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 16.12.16 at 15:45, wrote:
>> > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 02:28:54PM +, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 09:07:16AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >> > >>> On 30.11.16 at 1
>>> On 16.12.16 at 18:42, wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 09:18:13AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 16.12.16 at 15:28, wrote:
>> > On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 09:07:16AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >> >>> On 30.11.16 at 17:49, wrote:
>> >> > --- a/docs/misc/xen-command-line.markdown
>> >> > +
This run is configured for baseline tests only.
flight 68241 ovmf real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/68241/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 9 debian-hvm-insta
On 12/16/16 21:26 +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 16/12/16 13:43, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
This patch series starts to add a test selection "test-hvm64-vvmx" for
nested VMX. This first series focuses mostly on nested vmxon.
* Patch 01 - 03 test the basic environment (cpuid and MSR).
* Patch 04 - 0
flight 103742 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/103742/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
ovmf a35dc6499beb0b76c340379a06dff74a8d38095a
baseline version:
ovmf 04fd7859bd0185668f2cf
flight 103738 linux-3.18 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/103738/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-libvirt-pair 9 xen-boot/src_hostfail REGR. vs. 101675
test-amd64-i386-libv
On 12/16/16 20:59 +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 16/12/16 13:43, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
Fault #GP(0) is expected in this test.
Signed-off-by: Haozhong Zhang
---
tests/vvmx/vmxon.c | 29 +
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tests/vvmx/vmxon.c b/tests/vvmx
On 12/16/16 20:40 +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 16/12/16 13:43, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
+static uint8_t get_cpu_paddr_bits(void)
+{
+uint8_t paddr_bits = 36;
+uint32_t eax;
+
+eax = cpuid_eax(0x8000);
+if ( (eax >> 16) == 0x8000 && eax >= 0x8008 )
+{
+eax = cpu
On 12/16/16 20:33 +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 16/12/16 13:43, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
diff --git a/tests/vvmx/vmxon.c b/tests/vvmx/vmxon.c
index 31f074c..ca33b3c 100644
--- a/tests/vvmx/vmxon.c
+++ b/tests/vvmx/vmxon.c
@@ -28,11 +28,42 @@ static bool test_vmxon_novmxe(void)
On 12/16/16 20:25 +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 16/12/16 13:43, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
diff --git a/tests/vvmx/util.c b/tests/vvmx/util.c
index 74b4d01..f30fc26 100644
--- a/tests/vvmx/util.c
+++ b/tests/vvmx/util.c
@@ -1,7 +1,31 @@
#include
+#include
#include
#include "util.h"
+#define I
On 12/16/16 20:16 +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 16/12/16 13:43, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
handle_vmxinsn_err() is added to check and output the mismatch between
errors in the execution of a VMX instruction and the expected errors.
Signed-off-by: Haozhong Zhang
---
tests/vvmx/util.c | 104 +++
On 12/16/16 19:03 +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 16/12/16 13:43, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
diff --git a/include/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmcs.h b/include/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmcs.h
new file mode 100644
index 000..e1a6ef8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmcs.h
@@ -0,0 +1,179 @@
+#ifndef XTF_X86
On 12/16/16 19:47 +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 16/12/16 13:43, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
Review of the technical side of the patch, leaving the licensing to the
other thread.
Reordering for better logical clarity for my suggestion.
diff --git a/tests/vvmx/util.h b/tests/vvmx/util.h
new file mod
Ensure all reserved fields of xatp are zero before making hypervisor
call to XEN in xen_map_device_mmio(). xenmem_add_to_physmap_one() in
XEN fails the mapping request if extra.res reserved field in xatp is
not zero for XENMAPSPACE_dev_mmio request.
Signed-off-by: Jiandi An
---
drivers/xen/arm-
On 12/16/16 17:19 +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 16/12/16 13:43, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
It tests whether bit 31 and bit 48 are 0, and VMCS size is in the
range (0, 4096].
Signed-off-by: Haozhong Zhang
---
include/arch/x86/msr-index.h | 4
tests/vvmx/msr.c | 47 +++
On 12/16/16 16:17 +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 16/12/16 13:43, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
diff --git a/tests/vvmx/msr.c b/tests/vvmx/msr.c
new file mode 100644
index 000..100491d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/vvmx/msr.c
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
+#include
+
+#include
+
+/*
+ * NB. Guest MSR_IA32_FEATURE_C
On 12/16/16 14:40 +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 16/12/16 13:43, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
diff --git a/tests/vvmx/cpuid.c b/tests/vvmx/cpuid.c
new file mode 100644
index 000..9a4cdae
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/vvmx/cpuid.c
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+#include
+
+bool test_cpuid_vmx_feat(void)
+{
+uin
On 12/16/16 14:12 +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 16/12/16 13:43, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
This patch series starts to add a test selection "test-hvm64-vvmx" for
nested VMX. This first series focuses mostly on nested vmxon.
* Patch 01 - 03 test the basic environment (cpuid and MSR).
* Patch 04 - 0
This run is configured for baseline tests only.
flight 68240 ovmf real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/68240/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
ovmf 04fd7859bd0185668f2cf9213273a5fb4bcc7123
baseline v
c/s 08fac63 misused v->domain-arch.paging.gfn_bits as the width of
guest physical address and missed adding PAGE_SHIFT to it when
checking vmxon operand.
Signed-off-by: Haozhong Zhang
---
xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vvmx.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/xen/arch/x
flight 103736 linux-4.1 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/103736/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl 6 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 101737
test-amd64-i386-xl-qe
flight 103737 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/103737/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-36 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 103466
test-amd64-amd64-x
flight 103739 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/103739/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
ovmf 04fd7859bd0185668f2cf9213273a5fb4bcc7123
baseline version:
ovmf c0584d0bdd4463551db8f
flight 103688 linux-3.18 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/103688/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-libvirt-pair 9 xen-boot/src_hostfail REGR. vs. 101675
test-amd64-i386-libv
flight 103659 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/103659/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-i386-pvgrub 6 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 103466
test-xtf-amd64-amd
flight 103652 linux-4.1 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/103652/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl 6 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 101737
test-amd64-i386-xl-qe
On 18/12/16 14:02, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
> On 12/14/16 18:11 +0800, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
>> Check whether the operand of L1 vmxon is a valid VMXON region address
>> and whether the VMXON region at that address contains a valid revision
>> ID.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Haozhong Zhang
>> Reviewed-by: An
On 12/14/16 18:11 +0800, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
Check whether the operand of L1 vmxon is a valid VMXON region address
and whether the VMXON region at that address contains a valid revision
ID.
Signed-off-by: Haozhong Zhang
Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper
Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Acked-by:
On 18/12/2016 10:38, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 18/12/2016 05:21, osstest service owner wrote:
>> flight 103540 xen-unstable real [real]
>> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/103540/
>>
>> Regressions :-(
>>
>> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
>> including tests which coul
On 18/12/2016 05:21, osstest service owner wrote:
> flight 103540 xen-unstable real [real]
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/103540/
>
> Regressions :-(
>
> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> including tests which could not be run:
> test-amd64-amd64-i386-pvgrub 6 xe
flight 103698 xen-unstable-coverity real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/103698/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
xen fa25f10f2af877ed6bfa2ddce3d321ff61268c13
baseline version:
xen fc92
* Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 12/08/2016 11:33 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> >
> >> The new Xen PVH entry point requires page tables to be setup by the
> >> kernel since it is entered with paging disabled.
> >>
> >> Pull the common code out of head_32.S so that mk_early_
flight 103561 linux-3.18 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/103561/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-libvirt-pair 9 xen-boot/src_hostfail REGR. vs. 101675
test-amd64-i386-libv
35 matches
Mail list logo
