[Xen-devel] [qemu-upstream-4.5-testing test] 102684: regressions - FAIL

2016-11-27 Thread osstest service owner
flight 102684 qemu-upstream-4.5-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/102684/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 13 saverestore-support-check fail REGR. vs. 99725 Tests

[Xen-devel] [ovmf test] 102687: all pass - PUSHED

2016-11-27 Thread osstest service owner
flight 102687 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/102687/ Perfect :-) All tests in this flight passed as required version targeted for testing: ovmf 418373a1cd97abc0c0e3557f7a00105291829e6f baseline version: ovmf f17e28c7911f6d2f985e7

[Xen-devel] [xen-4.5-testing test] 102683: regressions - FAIL

2016-11-27 Thread osstest service owner
flight 102683 xen-4.5-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/102683/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-armhf-armhf-libvirt13 saverestore-support-check fail REGR. vs. 101275 Tests which are

[Xen-devel] [ovmf baseline-only test] 68110: all pass

2016-11-27 Thread Platform Team regression test user
This run is configured for baseline tests only. flight 68110 ovmf real [real] http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/68110/ Perfect :-) All tests in this flight passed as required version targeted for testing: ovmf f17e28c7911f6d2f985e7bb77e1c68cfd79bf056 baseline v

[Xen-devel] Payed Xen Admin

2016-11-27 Thread Michael Schinzel
Good Morning, we have some issues with our Xen Hosts. It seems it is a xen bug but we do not find the solution. NameID Mem VCPUs State Time(s) Domain-0 0 16192 4 r- 147102.5 (null)

[Xen-devel] [qemu-upstream-4.7-testing test] 102682: regressions - FAIL

2016-11-27 Thread osstest service owner
flight 102682 qemu-upstream-4.7-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/102682/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-xsm 13 saverestore-support-check fail REGR. vs. 100711 test

[Xen-devel] [qemu-upstream-4.6-testing test] 102681: regressions - FAIL

2016-11-27 Thread osstest service owner
flight 102681 qemu-upstream-4.6-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/102681/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 13 saverestore-support-check fail REGR. vs. 99723 test-

[Xen-devel] [ovmf test] 102685: all pass - PUSHED

2016-11-27 Thread osstest service owner
flight 102685 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/102685/ Perfect :-) All tests in this flight passed as required version targeted for testing: ovmf f17e28c7911f6d2f985e7bb77e1c68cfd79bf056 baseline version: ovmf 4575a602ca6072ee9d041

[Xen-devel] [qemu-upstream-4.5-testing test] 102680: regressions - FAIL

2016-11-27 Thread osstest service owner
flight 102680 qemu-upstream-4.5-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/102680/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 13 saverestore-support-check fail REGR. vs. 99725 Tests

[Xen-devel] [xen-4.5-testing test] 102679: regressions - FAIL

2016-11-27 Thread osstest service owner
flight 102679 xen-4.5-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/102679/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-armhf-armhf-libvirt13 saverestore-support-check fail REGR. vs. 101275 Tests which are

Re: [Xen-devel] arm64: Approach for DT based NUMA and issues

2016-11-27 Thread Dario Faggioli
On Sun, 2016-11-27 at 12:23 +, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi Dario, > Hi, > On 27/11/2016 01:01, Dario Faggioli wrote: > > On Sat, 2016-11-26 at 12:29 +0530, Vijay Kilari wrote: > > I agree that we need to support vNUMA for Dom0 sooner rather than > > later, and I agree that Dom0 is a bit special,

[Xen-devel] [qemu-upstream-4.7-testing test] 102678: regressions - trouble: broken/fail/pass

2016-11-27 Thread osstest service owner
flight 102678 qemu-upstream-4.7-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/102678/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-xsm 13 saverestore-support-check fail REGR. vs. 100711 test

[Xen-devel] [qemu-upstream-4.6-testing test] 102676: regressions - FAIL

2016-11-27 Thread osstest service owner
flight 102676 qemu-upstream-4.6-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/102676/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 13 saverestore-support-check fail REGR. vs. 99723 test-

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.8] x86/cpu: Reposition stack alignment check

2016-11-27 Thread Wei Liu
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 07:04:51PM +, Andrew Cooper wrote: > As identified during review, using BUG_ON() before `lidt` will result in a > triple fault, even on APs. > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper > --- > CC: Jan Beulich > CC: Wei Liu On the basis that this is a critical bug fix: Release

[Xen-devel] [qemu-upstream-4.5-testing test] 102675: regressions - FAIL

2016-11-27 Thread osstest service owner
flight 102675 qemu-upstream-4.5-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/102675/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 13 saverestore-support-check fail REGR. vs. 99725 Tests

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 102674: tolerable FAIL

2016-11-27 Thread osstest service owner
flight 102674 xen-unstable real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/102674/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-xsm 13 saverestore-support-checkfail like 102668 test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-qc

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable baseline-only test] 68107: regressions - FAIL

2016-11-27 Thread Platform Team regression test user
This run is configured for baseline tests only. flight 68107 xen-unstable real [real] http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/68107/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-migrupgrade 5 host-ping-check-

Re: [Xen-devel] arm64: Approach for DT based NUMA and issues

2016-11-27 Thread Julien Grall
Hi Dario, On 27/11/2016 01:01, Dario Faggioli wrote: On Sat, 2016-11-26 at 12:29 +0530, Vijay Kilari wrote: 4) Generating memory nodes for DOM0 - Linux kernel device drivers that uses devm_zalloc(), tries to allocate memory from local memo

[Xen-devel] [xen-4.5-testing test] 102673: regressions - FAIL

2016-11-27 Thread osstest service owner
flight 102673 xen-4.5-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/102673/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-armhf-armhf-libvirt13 saverestore-support-check fail REGR. vs. 101275 Tests which are

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable-coverity test] 102677: all pass - PUSHED

2016-11-27 Thread osstest service owner
flight 102677 xen-unstable-coverity real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/102677/ Perfect :-) All tests in this flight passed as required version targeted for testing: xen 1c524dd494019bc98e23075dcdba11c8e6add017 baseline version: xen 986f

[Xen-devel] [qemu-upstream-4.7-testing test] 102672: regressions - FAIL

2016-11-27 Thread osstest service owner
flight 102672 qemu-upstream-4.7-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/102672/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-xsm 13 saverestore-support-check fail REGR. vs. 100711 test