[Xen-devel] [qemu-upstream-4.6-testing test] 102670: regressions - trouble: broken/fail/pass

2016-11-26 Thread osstest service owner
flight 102670 qemu-upstream-4.6-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/102670/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 13 saverestore-support-check fail REGR. vs. 99723 test-

[Xen-devel] [qemu-upstream-4.5-testing test] 102669: regressions - FAIL

2016-11-26 Thread osstest service owner
flight 102669 qemu-upstream-4.5-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/102669/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 13 saverestore-support-check fail REGR. vs. 99725 Tests

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 102668: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

2016-11-26 Thread osstest service owner
flight 102668 xen-unstable real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/102668/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): test-amd64-amd64-xl-rtds 9 debian-install fail blocked in 102618 test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-xs

Re: [Xen-devel] Can't always start 32 bit domains after 64 bit domains

2016-11-26 Thread Sarah Newman
On 11/26/2016 05:14 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote: > On Tue, 2016-11-22 at 22:40 +0100, Dario Faggioli wrote: >> On Tue, 2016-11-22 at 11:37 -0800, Sarah Newman wrote: >>> If you're saying not specifying "cpus=..." will keep libxl from >>> interfering with the Xens default allocation policy, then Xens >

[Xen-devel] [xen-4.5-testing test] 102666: regressions - FAIL

2016-11-26 Thread osstest service owner
flight 102666 xen-4.5-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/102666/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-armhf-armhf-libvirt13 saverestore-support-check fail REGR. vs. 101275 Tests which are

Re: [Xen-devel] Can't always start 32 bit domains after 64 bit domains

2016-11-26 Thread Dario Faggioli
On Tue, 2016-11-22 at 22:40 +0100, Dario Faggioli wrote: > On Tue, 2016-11-22 at 11:37 -0800, Sarah Newman wrote: > > If you're saying not specifying "cpus=..." will keep libxl from > > interfering with the Xens default allocation policy, then Xens > > default allocation > > policy no longer starts

Re: [Xen-devel] arm64: Approach for DT based NUMA and issues

2016-11-26 Thread Dario Faggioli
On Sat, 2016-11-26 at 12:29 +0530, Vijay Kilari wrote: > 4) Generating memory nodes for DOM0 > - > Linux kernel device drivers that uses devm_zalloc(), tries to > allocate memory > from local memory node. So Dom0 needs to have memory allocated

[Xen-devel] [qemu-upstream-4.7-testing test] 102664: regressions - FAIL

2016-11-26 Thread osstest service owner
flight 102664 qemu-upstream-4.7-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/102664/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-xsm 13 saverestore-support-check fail REGR. vs. 100711 test

[Xen-devel] [qemu-upstream-4.6-testing test] 102663: regressions - FAIL

2016-11-26 Thread osstest service owner
flight 102663 qemu-upstream-4.6-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/102663/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 13 saverestore-support-check fail REGR. vs. 99723 test-

[Xen-devel] [qemu-upstream-4.5-testing test] 102662: regressions - trouble: broken/fail/pass

2016-11-26 Thread osstest service owner
flight 102662 qemu-upstream-4.5-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/102662/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 13 saverestore-support-check fail REGR. vs. 99725 Tests

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 102661: regressions - FAIL

2016-11-26 Thread osstest service owner
flight 102661 xen-unstable real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/102661/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-armhf-armhf-xl-arndale 5 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 102618 Regressions which

[Xen-devel] [xen-4.5-testing test] 102657: regressions - FAIL

2016-11-26 Thread osstest service owner
flight 102657 xen-4.5-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/102657/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-armhf-armhf-libvirt13 saverestore-support-check fail REGR. vs. 101275 Tests which are

[Xen-devel] [libvirt test] 102660: tolerable all pass - PUSHED

2016-11-26 Thread osstest service owner
flight 102660 libvirt real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/102660/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-xsm 13 saverestore-support-checkfail like 102640 test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 13

[Xen-devel] [distros-debian-stretch test] 68104: tolerable FAIL

2016-11-26 Thread Platform Team regression test user
flight 68104 distros-debian-stretch real [real] http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/68104/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): test-armhf-armhf-armhf-stretch-netboot-pygrub 9 debian-di-install fail like 68065 test-amd64-

[Xen-devel] [ovmf baseline-only test] 68103: all pass

2016-11-26 Thread Platform Team regression test user
This run is configured for baseline tests only. flight 68103 ovmf real [real] http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/68103/ Perfect :-) All tests in this flight passed as required version targeted for testing: ovmf 4575a602ca6072ee9d04150b38bfb143cbff8588 baseline v

[Xen-devel] [qemu-upstream-unstable baseline-only test] 68102: regressions - FAIL

2016-11-26 Thread Platform Team regression test user
This run is configured for baseline tests only. flight 68102 qemu-upstream-unstable real [real] http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/68102/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-xsm 11 guest

[Xen-devel] FYI: Your [FOSDEM] stand proposal for Xen Project has been accepted

2016-11-26 Thread Lars Kurth
FYI: if anyone from our community is attending FOSDEM and wants to help out, give demos, etc. - please get in touch with me privately I am also going to put together a Xen Project related sheet with accepted talks on it: if you get talks accepted in the main track or any DevRoom's, please get in

[Xen-devel] [qemu-upstream-4.7-testing test] 102654: regressions - FAIL

2016-11-26 Thread osstest service owner
flight 102654 qemu-upstream-4.7-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/102654/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-xsm 13 saverestore-support-check fail REGR. vs. 100711 test

[Xen-devel] [qemu-upstream-4.6-testing test] 102653: regressions - FAIL

2016-11-26 Thread osstest service owner
flight 102653 qemu-upstream-4.6-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/102653/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 13 saverestore-support-check fail REGR. vs. 99723 test-