Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH-for-4.9 v1 8/8] x86/hvm: serialize trap injecting producer and consumer

2016-11-20 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 18.11.16 at 18:14, wrote: > Since injection works on a remote vCPU, and since there's no > enforcement of the subject vCPU being paused, there's a potential race > between the producing and consuming sides. Fix this by leveraging the > vector field as synchronization variable. > > Signed-o

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add myself as the public API "Czar"

2016-11-20 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 18.11.16 at 18:45, wrote: > On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 10:06:59AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote: >> >>> On 18.11.16 at 17:18, wrote: >> > --- a/MAINTAINERS >> > +++ b/MAINTAINERS >> > @@ -304,6 +304,11 @@ X:xen/arch/x86/acpi/lib.c >> > F:xen/drivers/cpufreq/ >> > F:xen/includ

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen virtual IOMMU high level design doc V3

2016-11-20 Thread Tian, Kevin
> From: Lan, Tianyu > Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2016 11:37 PM > > Change since V2: > 1) Update motivation for Xen vIOMMU - 288 vcpus support part > Add descriptor about plan of increasing vcpu from 128 to 255 and > dependency between X2APIC and interrupt remapping. > 2) Update

[Xen-devel] [ovmf baseline-only test] 68071: all pass

2016-11-20 Thread Platform Team regression test user
This run is configured for baseline tests only. flight 68071 ovmf real [real] http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/68071/ Perfect :-) All tests in this flight passed as required version targeted for testing: ovmf 6a62309459e36d59e4cfe14885fa3ed807841c62 baseline v

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] x86/cpuid: Add AVX512_4VNNIW and AVX512_4FMAPS support

2016-11-20 Thread He Chen
Add two new AVX512 subfeatures support for guest. AVX512_4VNNIW: Vector instructions for deep learning enhanced word variable precision. AVX512_4FMAPS: Vector instructions for deep learning floating-point single precision. Signed-off-by: Luwei Kang Signed-off-by: He Chen --- Changes from v1:

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen-scsifront: Add a missing call to kfree

2016-11-20 Thread Juergen Gross
On 19/11/16 19:22, Quentin Lambert wrote: > Most error branches following the call to kmalloc contain > a call to kfree. This patch add these calls where they are > missing. > > This issue was found with Hector. > > Signed-off-by: Quentin Lambert Nice catch. I think this will need some more wor

[Xen-devel] [ovmf test] 102464: all pass - PUSHED

2016-11-20 Thread osstest service owner
flight 102464 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/102464/ Perfect :-) All tests in this flight passed as required version targeted for testing: ovmf 6a62309459e36d59e4cfe14885fa3ed807841c62 baseline version: ovmf 632dcfd6857b6211ce3fe

[Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fixes to build-system (make src-tarball-release)

2016-11-20 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Hey! Attached are two fixes to the tarball building that I found while I was trying to make an RPM for Fedora Core 25 - in which I wanted to build TianoCore in. Sadly it seems that when we build the source tarball we are missing a couple of directories: - SeaBIOS - TianoCore I am not sure if t

[Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] build system: Include SeaBIOS and TianoCore directory

2016-11-20 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
The release source did not include those two directories. Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk --- tools/misc/mktarball | 5 + 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/misc/mktarball b/tools/misc/mktarball index 73282b5..7942846 100755 --- a/tools/misc/mktarball +++ b/tools/misc/m

[Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2] build system: Also include the TianoCore custom Makefile

2016-11-20 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
that we put in the ovmf-dir (see tools/firmware/Makefile). Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk --- tools/misc/mktarball | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/tools/misc/mktarball b/tools/misc/mktarball index 7942846..356def3 100755 --- a/tools/misc/mktarball +++ b/tools/misc/mktar

[Xen-devel] [qemu-mainline test] 102458: regressions - FAIL

2016-11-20 Thread osstest service owner
flight 102458 qemu-mainline real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/102458/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-vhd 9 debian-di-installfail REGR. vs. 101909 test-amd64-amd64-

[Xen-devel] [PATCH] OvmfPkg/build.sh: Use GCC49 toolchain with GCC 6.*

2016-11-20 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Without this I cannot build it under Fedora Core 25. Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0 Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk --- OvmfPkg/build.sh | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/OvmfPkg/build.sh b/OvmfPkg/build.sh index eb5eb73..759ade3 10

[Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix TianoCore building under Fedora Core 25

2016-11-20 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Please accept and review the following patch which enables me to build TianoCore under Fedora Core 25. The GCC version that is installed is: gcc (GCC) 6.2.1 20160916 (Red Hat 6.2.1-2) Copyright (C) 2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen virtual IOMMU high level design doc V3

2016-11-20 Thread Lan, Tianyu
On 11/19/2016 3:43 AM, Julien Grall wrote: Hi Lan, On 17/11/2016 09:36, Lan Tianyu wrote: 1) Definition of "struct xen_dmop_viommu_op" as new hypercall parameter. struct xen_dmop_viommu_op { u32 cmd; u32 domid; u32 viommu_id; union { struct { u32 capabili

Re: [Xen-devel] [libvirt] Opinions on removing the old, legacy libvirt Xen driver

2016-11-20 Thread Martin Kletzander
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 02:25:18PM -0700, Jim Fehlig wrote: Hi All, I briefly mentioned this at an evening event during the KVM Forum / Xen Dev Summit, but the list is certainly a better place to discuss such a topic. What do folks think about finally removing the old, legacy, xend-based driver

[Xen-devel] [qemu-mainline test] 102452: regressions - FAIL

2016-11-20 Thread osstest service owner
flight 102452 qemu-mainline real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/102452/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-vhd 9 debian-di-installfail REGR. vs. 101909 test-amd64-amd64-

[Xen-devel] [qemu-mainline bisection] complete test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-xsm

2016-11-20 Thread osstest service owner
branch xen-unstable xenbranch xen-unstable job test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-xsm testid guest-start Tree: libvirt git://xenbits.xen.org/libvirt.git Tree: libvirt_gnulib git://git.sv.gnu.org/gnulib.git Tree: linux git://xenbits.xen.org/linux-pvops.git Tree: linuxfirmware git://xenbits.xen.org/osstest/li

Re: [Xen-devel] Error regarding filesystem in Dom0 in lager board

2016-11-20 Thread George John
Hi, On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 3:06 AM, Julien Grall wrote: > > > On 16/11/2016 11:23, George John wrote: > >> Hi, >> > > Hello George, > > I just bumped in to some errors related to filesystem . The following is >> the log. I am using xen 4.7.1 along with linux kernel 3.19.8 as Dom0 >> > > [...]

[Xen-devel] [qemu-mainline test] 102442: regressions - FAIL

2016-11-20 Thread osstest service owner
flight 102442 qemu-mainline real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/102442/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-vhd 9 debian-di-installfail REGR. vs. 101909 test-amd64-amd64-

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 102439: tolerable FAIL

2016-11-20 Thread osstest service owner
flight 102439 xen-unstable real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/102439/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking): test-armhf-armhf-xl-xsm 14 guest-stop fail in 102408 pass in 102439 test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-xsm 15

[Xen-devel] [libvirt test] 102443: tolerable all pass - PUSHED

2016-11-20 Thread osstest service owner
flight 102443 libvirt real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/102443/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 13 saverestore-support-checkfail like 102375 test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-xsm 13

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable-coverity test] 102447: all pass - PUSHED

2016-11-20 Thread osstest service owner
flight 102447 xen-unstable-coverity real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/102447/ Perfect :-) All tests in this flight passed as required version targeted for testing: xen 58bd0c7985890e0292212f94a56235228a3445c3 baseline version: xen 632f