Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v1 0/7] tools: add linker table userspace sandbox

On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 11:57:18PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: > On 08/19/2016 04:41 PM, mcg...@kernel.org wrote: > > Please let me know if there are any issue or questions. > > Only that this has been the majority of the traffic on the linux-sh > mailing list for over a month and I'm still not sure

[Xen-devel] [linux-3.14 baseline-only test] 67570: regressions - FAIL

This run is configured for baseline tests only. flight 67570 linux-3.14 real [real] http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/67570/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64 15 guest

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable baseline-only test] 67569: regressions - FAIL

This run is configured for baseline tests only. flight 67569 xen-unstable real [real] http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/67569/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-armhf-armhf-xl-xsm 15 guest-start/deb

[Xen-devel] Regression in kernel 4.7 xenstore

Hi, I'm running Xen 4.4.1 as packaged in Debian 8.5 (jessie) with home-baked kernels (that is, from kernel.org) (hardware is x86-64, in case that matters). After upgrading to kernel 4.7, xenstore-write is not able to set the Dom0 name anymore (and no DomU can be started). The journal shows: Aug

[Xen-devel] [distros-debian-stretch test] 67568: regressions - FAIL

flight 67568 distros-debian-stretch real [real] http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/67568/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-armhf-armhf-armhf-stretch-netboot-pygrub 9 debian-di-install fail REGR. vs. 6693

[Xen-devel] [linux-3.14 test] 100573: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

flight 100573 linux-3.14 real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/100573/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): build-i386-rumpuserxen6 xen-buildfail like 100510 build-amd64-rumpuserxen

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] mini-os: fix coverity issues in printf.c

Juergen Gross, on Wed 17 Aug 2016 15:39:59 +0200, wrote: > Fix two issues discovered by coverity. Thanks for processing mini-os through coverity :) Samuel ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] mini-os: fix coverity issues in printf.c

Wei Liu, on Wed 17 Aug 2016 15:13:27 +0100, wrote: > On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 03:39:59PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote: > > Fix two issues discovered by coverity. > > I would update the commit message to make it contain more information. > > Fix two issues discovered by Coverity: > > 1. properl mark

[Xen-devel] check if a page is modified

Hi, How can I check if a page is dirty or not in xen source code? I am debugging the hvm_hap_nested_page_fault function in hvm.c and want to see when a page fault occurs, see what is written on the page. Does the page_mark_dirty makes a page dirty or not? Regards,

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 100569: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

flight 100569 xen-unstable real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/100569/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): test-armhf-armhf-xl-rtds 15 guest-start/debian.repeatfail like 100551 build-amd64-rumpuserxen

Re: [Xen-devel] [MINIOS PATCH 3/3] x86: use unified linker script

Juergen Gross, on Thu 18 Aug 2016 12:39:00 +0200, wrote: > On 18/08/16 12:15, Wei Liu wrote: > > There are only a few differences between i386 and x86-64 linker scripts. > > Unify them into one. Re-indent the file at the same time. > > > > Construct a special rule in top-level directory to cope wi

Re: [Xen-devel] [MINIOS PATCH 2/3] x86: switch to use elfnote

Wei Liu, on Thu 18 Aug 2016 11:15:25 +0100, wrote: > Use the newer ELF note interface. The generated ELF notes results in > equivalent configuration. > > Also need to modify linker script to provide a note section. > > Signed-off-by: Wei Liu > Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross Acked-by: Samuel Thibau

Re: [Xen-devel] [MINIOS PATCH 1/3] Introduce asm_macros.h

Juergen Gross, on Thu 18 Aug 2016 12:34:48 +0200, wrote: > On 18/08/16 12:15, Wei Liu wrote: > > Ported from Xen Test Framework project (BSD license). > > > > Signed-off-by: Wei Liu > > Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross Acked-by: Samuel Thibault ___ Xen-d

[Xen-devel] [qemu-mainline baseline-only test] 67566: regressions - FAIL

This run is configured for baseline tests only. flight 67566 qemu-mainline real [real] http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/67566/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 11 guest-start

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable baseline-only test] 67565: regressions - FAIL

This run is configured for baseline tests only. flight 67565 xen-unstable real [real] http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/67565/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-amd64-pvgrub 6 xen-boot

[Xen-devel] [libvirt test] 100571: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

flight 100571 libvirt real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/100571/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 12 migrate-support-checkfail never pass test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-xsm 12 migrate-s