Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian
From: Quan Xu [mailto:quan@aliyun.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 31, 2016 1:39 PM
To: xen-devel; wei.liu2
Cc: Daniel De Graaf; jbeulich; dario.faggioli; Tian, Kevin; hanweidong; Emil
Condrea; Stefano Stabellini
Subject: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: update email
Signed-off-by: Quan
This run is configured for baseline tests only.
flight 66874 xen-unstable real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/66874/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i386-xsm3 host-install(3)
Signed-off-by: Mihai Donțu
---
Changed since v2:
* added tests for {,v}movq xmm,r64
---
tools/tests/x86_emulator/test_x86_emulator.c | 120 +++
1 file changed, 120 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/tests/x86_emulator/test_x86_emulator.c
b/tools/tests/x86_emulator/test_x8
Signed-off-by: Mihai Donțu
---
Changed since v2:
* minor change to make it more obvious what the code does
Changed since v1:
* added a test for vmovq
* made the tests depend on SSE and AVX, respectively
* added emulator support for vmovq (0xd6 forces the operand size to
64bit)
---
tools/t
Found that Windows driver was using a SSE2 instruction MOVD.
Signed-off-by: Zhi Wang
Signed-off-by: Mihai Donțu
---
Picked from the XenServer 7 patch queue, as suggested by Andrew Cooper
Changed since v2:
* handle the case where the destination is a GPR
---
xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulat
flight 99873 linux-4.1 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/99873/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-armhf-armhf-xl-xsm 11 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 96211
Tests which are failing
flight 99872 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/99872/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 16 guest-stop fail like 99672
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win
Hi Andrew,
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 3:42 PM
> To: Wu, Feng
> Cc: Andrew Cooper (andrew.coop...@citrix.com)
> ; Nakajima, Jun ;
> Wang, Yong Y ; xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> Subject: Re: SMAP/SMEP issues with 32-bit pv
Hi I am studying xen student
I got a question in end boot allocator code
Why xen reads bootmem_region_list backwards??
for ( i= nr_bootmem_regions ; i -- >0 ; )
{struct bootmem_region ...}
I think there would be no problem although it reads its values forward
because added page list is same.
T
flight 99864 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/99864/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-qcow2 6 xen-boot fail in 99835 pass in 99864
test-armhf-armhf-xl 15 gu
flight 99847 linux-4.1 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/99847/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-armhf-armhf-xl-xsm 11 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 96211
test-amd64-i386-freebsd
flight 99853 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/99853/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64-xsm 5 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 99672
Regressions which a
This run is configured for baseline tests only.
flight 66873 ovmf real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/66873/
Failures and problems with tests :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd
This run is configured for baseline tests only.
flight 66872 linux-3.18 real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/66872/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-intel 3 host-inst
branch xen-unstable
xenbranch xen-unstable
job test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64-xsm
testid debian-hvm-install
Tree: linux
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git
Tree: linuxfirmware git://xenbits.xen.org/osstest/linux-firmware.git
Tree: qemu git://xenbits.xen
flight 99851 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/99851/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
ovmf 2c855d3aaf36da80f8c4f0ae12d31900a628b0a9
baseline version:
ovmf 92e9b9f9df2d51c80844adb
flight 99835 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/99835/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-qcow2 6 xen-bootfail REGR. vs. 99772
Regressions which ar
Thanks Anthony for the feedback.
I will send v10 containing fixes for patches 1 to 12 + additional patches
for
fixing code style issues for moved code.
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 5:09 PM, Anthony PERARD
wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 02:47:31PM +0300, Emil Condrea wrote:
> > Emil Condrea (19):
>
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Anthony PERARD
wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 02:47:35PM +0300, Emil Condrea wrote:
> > The name of the functions moved:
> > * xen_be_evtchn_event
> > * xen_be_unbind_evtchn
> > * xen_be_send_notify
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Emil Condrea
> > ---
> > hw/xen/xen
flight 99860 xen-unstable-coverity real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/99860/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
coverity-amd645 coverity-buildfail REGR. vs. 96924
version tar
flight 99832 linux-3.18 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/99832/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
build-amd64-rumpuserxen 6 xen-buildfail like 96188
build-i386-rumpuserxen6
21 matches
Mail list logo
