Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v7 07/11] IOMMU: propagate IOMMU Device-TLB flush error up to IOMMU suspending (top level ones)

2016-06-11 Thread Tian, Kevin
> From: Xu, Quan > Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2016 4:59 PM > > From: Quan Xu > > Signed-off-by: Quan Xu > > CC: Jan Beulich > CC: Liu Jinsong > CC: Keir Fraser > CC: Andrew Cooper > CC: Suravee Suthikulpanit > CC: Stefano Stabellini > CC: Julien Grall > CC: Kevin Tian > CC: Feng Wu >

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v7 05/11] IOMMU/MMU: propagate IOMMU Device-TLB flush error up to iommu_iotlb_flush{, _all} (top level ones)

2016-06-11 Thread Tian, Kevin
> From: Julien Grall [mailto:julien.gr...@arm.com] > Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2016 8:40 PM > > Hi Jan, > > On 09/06/16 13:32, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 09.06.16 at 14:24, wrote: > >> So the behavior of iommu_iotlb_flush is up to the IOMMU driver. Whilst > >> the behavior of iommu_{,un}map_pag

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v7 05/11] IOMMU/MMU: propagate IOMMU Device-TLB flush error up to iommu_iotlb_flush{, _all} (top level ones)

2016-06-11 Thread Tian, Kevin
> From: Xu, Quan > Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2016 4:59 PM > > From: Quan Xu > > Signed-off-by: Quan Xu > Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich > Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v7 02/11] IOMMU/MMU: enhance the call trees of IOMMU unmapping and mapping

2016-06-11 Thread Tian, Kevin
> From: Xu, Quan > Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2016 4:59 PM > > From: Quan Xu > > When IOMMU mapping is failed, we issue a best effort rollback, stopping > IOMMU mapping, unmapping the previous IOMMU maps and then reporting the > error up to the call trees. When rollback is not feasible (in early

[Xen-devel] [linux-3.14 test] 95514: regressions - FAIL

2016-06-11 Thread osstest service owner
flight 95514 linux-3.14 real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/95514/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-nested-amd 13 xen-boot/l1 fail REGR. vs. 95164 test-amd64-amd64-qemuu

[Xen-devel] [xen-4.5-testing bisection] complete test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-amd

2016-06-11 Thread osstest service owner
branch xen-4.5-testing xenbranch xen-4.5-testing job test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-amd testid guest-start/redhat.repeat Tree: linux git://xenbits.xen.org/linux-pvops.git Tree: linuxfirmware git://xenbits.xen.org/osstest/linux-firmware.git Tree: qemu git://xenbits.xen.org/qemu-xen-traditional.git

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/XSTATE: clarify XRSTOR() macro

2016-06-11 Thread Shuai Ruan
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 06:50:56AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > Make obvious that xcomp_bv is expected to be clear when we get here > with XSTATE_COMPACTION_ENABLED not set. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich Reviewed-by: Shuai Ruan ___ Xen-devel mailing

[Xen-devel] [qemu-upstream-4.6-testing test] 95509: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

2016-06-11 Thread osstest service owner
flight 95509 qemu-upstream-4.6-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/95509/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 16 guest-stop fail like 95441 test-amd64-i386-

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 1/2] x86/mem-sharing: Bulk mem-sharing entire domains

2016-06-11 Thread Tamas K Lengyel
On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 5:24 PM, Tamas K Lengyel wrote: > Currently mem-sharing can be performed on a page-by-page base from the control > domain. However, when completely deduplicating (cloning) a VM, this requires > at least 3 hypercalls per page. As the user has to loop through all pages up > t

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 1/2] x86/mem-sharing: Bulk mem-sharing entire domains

2016-06-11 Thread Tamas K Lengyel
Currently mem-sharing can be performed on a page-by-page base from the control domain. However, when completely deduplicating (cloning) a VM, this requires at least 3 hypercalls per page. As the user has to loop through all pages up to max_gpfn, this process is very slow and wasteful. This patch i

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 2/2] tests/mem-sharing: Add bulk option to memshrtool

2016-06-11 Thread Tamas K Lengyel
Add the bulk option to the test tool to perform complete deduplication between domains. Signed-off-by: Tamas K Lengyel Acked-by: Wei Liu --- Cc: Ian Jackson Cc: Stefano Stabellini Cc: Ian Campbell --- tools/tests/mem-sharing/memshrtool.c | 22 ++ 1 file changed, 22 insert

[Xen-devel] [libvirt test] 95520: regressions - FAIL

2016-06-11 Thread osstest service owner
flight 95520 libvirt real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/95520/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-i386-libvirt5 libvirt-build fail REGR. vs. 95460 build-amd64-libvirt

[Xen-devel] [qemu-mainline test] 95502: regressions - FAIL

2016-06-11 Thread osstest service owner
flight 95502 qemu-mainline real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/95502/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-amd64 10 guest-startfail REGR. vs. 94856 test-amd64-amd64-qe

[Xen-devel] [qemu-upstream-4.4-testing test] 95501: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

2016-06-11 Thread osstest service owner
flight 95501 qemu-upstream-4.4-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/95501/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 13 guest-localmigrate fail REGR. vs. 95433 test-amd64-i386

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4] altp2m: Allow the hostp2m entries to be of type p2m_ram_shared

2016-06-11 Thread Tamas K Lengyel
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 10:17 AM, Tamas K Lengyel wrote: > > On May 26, 2016 04:40, "George Dunlap" wrote: >> >> On 26/05/16 04:55, Tamas K Lengyel wrote: >> > Move sharing locks above altp2m to avoid locking order violation. Allow >> > applying altp2m mem_access settings when the hostp2m entries

[Xen-devel] [xen-4.6-testing test] 95497: regressions - FAIL

2016-06-11 Thread osstest service owner
flight 95497 xen-4.6-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/95497/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2 15 guest-start/debian.repeat fail REGR. vs. 95447 test-armhf-armhf-

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.7-testing test] 95489: regressions - FAIL

2016-06-11 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 11/06/16 13:00, Wei Liu wrote: > On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 09:31:40AM +, osstest service owner wrote: >> flight 95489 xen-4.7-testing real [real] >> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/95489/ >> >> Regressions :-( >> >> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, >> including te

[Xen-devel] [xen-4.5-testing test] 95485: trouble: broken/fail/pass

2016-06-11 Thread osstest service owner
flight 95485 xen-4.5-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/95485/ Failures and problems with tests :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-vhd 3 host-install(3) broken REGR. vs. 952

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.7-testing test] 95489: regressions - FAIL

2016-06-11 Thread Wei Liu
On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 09:31:40AM +, osstest service owner wrote: > flight 95489 xen-4.7-testing real [real] > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/95489/ > > Regressions :-( > > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, > including tests which could not be run: > test-amd64

[Xen-devel] [tip:x86/asm] x86/xen: Simplify set_aliased_prot()

2016-06-11 Thread tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
Commit-ID: 99158f10e91768d34c5004c40c42f802b719bcae Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/99158f10e91768d34c5004c40c42f802b719bcae Author: Andy Lutomirski AuthorDate: Tue, 24 May 2016 15:48:38 -0700 Committer: Ingo Molnar CommitDate: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 11:28:11 +0200 x86/xen: Simplify set_al

[Xen-devel] [xen-4.7-testing test] 95489: regressions - FAIL

2016-06-11 Thread osstest service owner
flight 95489 xen-4.7-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/95489/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-amd64 10 guest-startfail REGR. vs. 95446 Regressions which

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/7] x86/xen: Simplify set_aliased_prot

2016-06-11 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 2:50 AM, David Vrabel wrote: > > On 24/05/16 23:48, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > >> In aa1acff356bb ("x86/xen: Probe target addresses in > >> set_aliased_prot() before the hypercall"), I added an explicit probe > >> to work around a hypercall issue

[Xen-devel] [xen-4.4-testing test] 95488: regressions - FAIL

2016-06-11 Thread osstest service owner
flight 95488 xen-4.4-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/95488/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2 15 guest-start/debian.repeat fail REGR. vs. 95234 test-armhf-armhf-

[Xen-devel] [ovmf test] 95473: regressions - FAIL

2016-06-11 Thread osstest service owner
flight 95473 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/95473/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 17 guest-start/debianhvm.repeat fail REGR. vs. 94748 test-amd64-amd64-