[Xen-devel] [linux-linus test] 65765: regressions - FAIL

2015-12-12 Thread osstest service owner
flight 65765 linux-linus real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/65765/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-i386 6 xen-bootfail REGR. vs. 59254 test-amd64-i386-xl-qe

[Xen-devel] [qemu-mainline baseline-only test] 38503: regressions - FAIL

2015-12-12 Thread Platform Team regression test user
This run is configured for baseline tests only. flight 38503 qemu-mainline real [real] http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/38503/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvh-amd 6 xen-boot

[Xen-devel] [linux-mingo-tip-master test] 65763: regressions - FAIL

2015-12-12 Thread osstest service owner
flight 65763 linux-mingo-tip-master real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/65763/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-rumpuserxen-i386 10 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 60684 test-amd64

[Xen-devel] [xen-4.3-testing baseline-only test] 38501: tolerable FAIL

2015-12-12 Thread Platform Team regression test user
This run is configured for baseline tests only. flight 38501 xen-4.3-testing real [real] http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/38501/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): test-amd64-amd64-migrupgrade 21 guest-migrate/src_hos

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 65748: regressions - FAIL

2015-12-12 Thread osstest service owner
flight 65748 xen-unstable real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/65748/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2 15 guest-start/debian.repeat fail REGR. vs. 65635 Regressions which ar

[Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/x86/pvh: Use HVM's flush_tlb_others op

2015-12-12 Thread Boris Ostrovsky
Using MMUEXT_TLB_FLUSH_MULTI doesn't buy us much since the hypervisor will likely perform same IPIs as would have the guest. More importantly, using MMUEXT_INVLPG_MULTI may not to invalidate the guest's address on remote CPU (when, for example, VCPU from another guest is running there). Signed-of

Re: [Xen-devel] Taking on a Xen development project

2015-12-12 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 12/12/2015 22:30, Joshua Otto wrote: > On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 10:19:31AM +0800, Yang Hongyang wrote: >> On 2015年12月11日 01:23, Andrew Cooper wrote: >>> Hello - thankyou for your interest. >>> >>> One area to look at might be the parameters to the live migration >>> looping. As part of the migra

[Xen-devel] [libvirt test] 65756: regressions - FAIL

2015-12-12 Thread osstest service owner
flight 65756 libvirt real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/65756/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-i386-libvirt5 libvirt-build fail REGR. vs. 63340 build-amd64-libvirt

[Xen-devel] [xen-4.5-testing baseline-only test] 38500: tolerable FAIL

2015-12-12 Thread Platform Team regression test user
This run is configured for baseline tests only. flight 38500 xen-4.5-testing real [real] http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/38500/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 15 guest-localmig

Re: [Xen-devel] Taking on a Xen development project

2015-12-12 Thread Joshua Otto
On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 10:19:31AM +0800, Yang Hongyang wrote: > On 2015年12月11日 01:23, Andrew Cooper wrote: > > > >Hello - thankyou for your interest. > > > >One area to look at might be the parameters to the live migration > >looping. As part of the migration v2 rework I did in the 4.6 dev > >per

Re: [Xen-devel] Taking on a Xen development project

2015-12-12 Thread Joshua Otto
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 01:52:41PM +, Ian Campbell wrote: > Cool! Just to be clear, you are looking for one project for the 3 of you to > work on as a group (vs 3 individual projects), is that right? Yes, that's right. > It's been a while since there has been a scan run, I did one yesterday b

[Xen-devel] [linux-next test] 65737: regressions - FAIL

2015-12-12 Thread osstest service owner
flight 65737 linux-next real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/65737/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 9 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 65608 Regre

[Xen-devel] [linux-3.14 test] 65709: regressions - FAIL

2015-12-12 Thread osstest service owner
flight 65709 linux-3.14 real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/65709/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-rumpuserxen-i386 10 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 64562 Regressions which are

[Xen-devel] [linux-4.1 test] 65699: regressions - FAIL

2015-12-12 Thread osstest service owner
flight 65699 linux-4.1 real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/65699/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-rumpuserxen-i386 10 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 63996 Tests which are failing

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 2/2] VT-d: Fix vt-d flush timeout issue.

2015-12-12 Thread Quan Xu
If IOTLB/Context/IETC flush is timeout, we should think all devices under this IOMMU cannot function correctly. So for each device under this IOMMU we'll mark it as unassignable and kill the domain owning the device. If Device-TLB flush is timeout, we'll mark the target ATS device as unassignable

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 0/2] VT-d flush issue

2015-12-12 Thread Quan Xu
This patches are based on Kevin Tian's previous discussion 'Revisit VT-d asynchronous flush issue'. Fix current timeout concern and also allow limited ATS support in a light way: 1. Reduce spin timeout to 1ms, which can be boot-time changed with 'iommu_qi_timeout_ms'. For example:

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 1/2] VT-d: Reduce spin timeout to 1ms, which can be boot-time changed.

2015-12-12 Thread Quan Xu
Signed-off-by: Quan Xu --- xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/qinval.c | 11 +-- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/qinval.c b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/qinval.c index b81b0bd..990baf2 100644 --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/qinval.c +++

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable baseline-only test] 38496: tolerable trouble: broken/fail/pass

2015-12-12 Thread Platform Team regression test user
This run is configured for baseline tests only. flight 38496 xen-unstable real [real] http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/38496/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3-vcpus1 3 host-install(

[Xen-devel] [linux-3.10 test] 65697: regressions - FAIL

2015-12-12 Thread osstest service owner
flight 65697 linux-3.10 real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/65697/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-rumpuserxen-i386 10 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 64456 Regressions which are

[Xen-devel] sh_page_fault

2015-12-12 Thread Gohar Irfan
In case of HVM guests, where is the sh_page_fault function called? ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH XEN v6 29/32] tools/libs/call: Use O_CLOEXEC when opening /dev/xen/privcmd on Linux

2015-12-12 Thread Roger Pau Monné
El 11/12/15 a les 18.22, Ian Campbell ha escrit: > On Wed, 2015-12-09 at 16:17 +, Ian Jackson wrote: >> Ian Campbell writes ("[PATCH XEN v6 29/32] tools/libs/call: Use O_CLOEXEC >> when opening /dev/xen/privcmd on Linux"): >>> We stick with using FD_CLOEXEC on the legacy /proc/xen/privcmd >>> f

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 1/2] VT-d: Reduce spin timeout to 1ms, which can be boot-time changed.

2015-12-12 Thread Xu, Quan
>On 11.12.2015 at 6:01pm, wrpte: > >>> On 10.12.15 at 10:33, wrote: > > @@ -167,10 +172,12 @@ static int queue_invalidate_wait(struct iommu > *iommu, > > start_time = NOW(); > > while ( poll_slot != QINVAL_STAT_DONE ) > > { > > -if ( NOW() > (start_time + DM