>>> On 28.09.15 at 05:08, wrote:
Thursday, September 24, 2015 12:27 AM, Tim Deegan wrote:
>> 7/13: I'm not convinced that making the vcpu spin calling
>> sched_yield() is a very good plan. Better to explicitly pause the domain if
>> you
>> need its vcpus not to run. But first -- why does I
>>> On 28.09.15 at 07:02, wrote:
> There are several unused function and structure declarations in the
> hypervisor related to domain building. Remove them.
>
> Use an enum for elf_dom_parms.pae instead of just hard coding the
> values when setting the information and adjust the code to use those
>>> On 28.09.15 at 07:23, wrote:
> On 09/25/2015 05:42 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 25.09.15 at 13:54, wrote:
>>> Per-VCPU pause flags in sched.h are defined as bit positions and as
>>> values derived from the bit defines. There is only one user of a value
>>> which can be easily converted to
On 09/25/2015 05:42 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 25.09.15 at 13:54, wrote:
Per-VCPU pause flags in sched.h are defined as bit positions and as
values derived from the bit defines. There is only one user of a value
which can be easily converted to use a bit number as well.
I'm not convinced:
--
There are several unused function and structure declarations in the
hypervisor related to domain building. Remove them.
Use an enum for elf_dom_parms.pae instead of just hard coding the
values when setting the information and adjust the code to use those
instead of own macros (hypervisor and tools
flight 62392 xen-4.3-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/62392/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 17 guest-stop fail like 60742
Tests which did not succee
On 09/25/2015 05:39 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 13:44 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
Juergen Gross writes ("[PATCH 1/5] libxc: remove allocate member from
struct xc_dom_image"):
The allocate() callback in struct xc_dom_image is never set. Remove it.
Acked-by: Ian Jackson
Appli
Tim, thanks for your review.
>>> Thursday, September 24, 2015 12:27 AM, Tim Deegan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> At 14:09 + on 21 Sep (1442844587), Xu, Quan wrote:
> > George / Tim,
> > Could you help me review these memory patches? Thanks!
>
> The interrupt-mapping and chipset control parts of this are
flight 62389 xen-4.4-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/62389/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 16 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail REGR. vs.
60727
Regressions
On 9/22/2015 12:03 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
It is going to be in QEMU 2.5 and qemu-xen 4.7.
Thanks for your reply.
Do we have any possibility of just merging this series into qemu-xen
4.6? We really want to support IGD passthrough on xen 4.6 if possible :)
Thanks
Tiejun
On Mon, 21 S
flight 62381 linux-linus real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/62381/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-armhf-armhf-xl-cubietruck 6 xen-bootfail REGR. vs. 59254
test-armhf-armhf-xl-m
This run is configured for baseline tests only.
flight 38079 linux-3.10 real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/38079/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-winxpsp3 3 host-install(3) broken in
flight 62349 linux-mingo-tip-master real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/62349/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 13 guest-localmigrate
fail REGR. vs
flight 62328 xen-4.6-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/62328/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64 19 guest-start/debianhvm.repeat fail
REGR. vs. 62015
flight 62380 xen-4.2-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/62380/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
test-i386-i386-libvirt 18 guest-start/debian.repeat fail in 62285 pass in 62380
test-i386-i386-xl-qemuu-winxps
This might not seem useful or anything, but this is a part of an experiment
so I will describe what I'm trying to do:
Divide the memory into two equal halves and call them A and B.
Let's say region A has 10 pages, from page numbers 1 to 10. Region B has 10
pages from page numbers 11 to 20 (hypothe
flight 62365 linux-3.18 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/62365/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvh-intel 11 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 58581
Regressions which are
2015-09-23 4:42 GMT-04:00 Gohar Irfan :
>
> It is for a project, I'm trying to experiment with a couple of things.
Well, this is too general... Everything can be a project. People tries
to know what exact things you want to achieve so that they can figure
out if you are heading the correct directi
This run is configured for baseline tests only.
flight 38080 seabios real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/38080/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-i386-libvirt-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 10 migrate-support-c
On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 08:17:05PM +0300, NiX wrote:
> Hi.
>
Hi,
> As I posted about a week ago. I had an issue with an AMD FX-8350/Radeon
> 7970/Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3 and still do. After passing through the 7970, it
> works just fine on windows 10 for as long as I do not reboot/shutdown that
> V
flight 62359 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/62359/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed
version targeted for testing:
ovmf 28f27af6f007c3794fcc9d098ef91713160f4e5b
baseline version:
ovmf 8cfd008ef8da26d97314816e0635691955d
flight 62376 libvirt real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/62376/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64-libvirt 5 libvirt-build fail REGR. vs. 62281
build-i386-libvirt
Could someone please help me with this? It's really important and urgent.
Thanks a lot!
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 1:42 PM Gohar Irfan wrote:
> It is for a project, I'm trying to experiment with a couple of things.
>
> Could you please guide me how this could be achieved? Some relevant chunks
> of
23 matches
Mail list logo
