On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 7:21 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 18/09/15 14:08, vijay.kil...@gmail.com wrote:
>> From: Vijaya Kumar K
>>
>> This is based on DraftG version
>> http://xenbits.xen.org/people/ianc/vits/draftG.pdf
>>
>> Following major features are supported
>> - GICv3 ITS support for arm6
On 09/15/2015 06:50 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
On Thu, 2015-08-20 at 20:16 +0200, Juergen Groß wrote:
On 08/18/2015 05:55 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
Hey everyone,
So, as a followup of what we were discussing in this thread:
[Xen-devel] PV-vNUMA issue: topology is misinterpreted by the guest
branch xen-unstable
xen branch xen-unstable
job test-armhf-armhf-xl-vhd
test xen-boot
Tree: linux git://xenbits.xen.org/linux-pvops.git
Tree: linuxfirmware git://xenbits.xen.org/osstest/linux-firmware.git
Tree: qemuu git://git.qemu.org/qemu.git
Tree: xen git://xenbits.xen.org/xen.git
*** Found an
> -Original Message-
> From: dunl...@gmail.com [mailto:dunl...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of George
> Dunlap
> Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 10:34 PM
> To: Dario Faggioli
> Cc: Jan Beulich; George Dunlap; Tian, Kevin; Keir Fraser; Andrew Cooper;
> xen-devel@lists.xen.org; Wu, Feng
> Subject:
> -Original Message-
> From: George Dunlap [mailto:george.dun...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2015 5:38 PM
> To: Dario Faggioli; Wu, Feng
> Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org; Tian, Kevin; Keir Fraser; George Dunlap; Andrew
> Cooper; Jan Beulich
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v
> -Original Message-
> From: Wu, Feng
> Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2015 2:16 PM
> To: George Dunlap; Jan Beulich
> Cc: Tian, Kevin; Keir Fraser; Andrew Cooper; Dario Faggioli;
> xen-devel@lists.xen.org; Wu, Feng
> Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v6 16/18] vmx: Add some scheduler hooks
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 08:20:46AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> In any event, Borislav, you must have typed rdmsr_safe for a reason :)
>
> Wasn't me:
>
> 6c62aa4a3c12 ("x86: make amd.c have 64bit support code")
>
> I think the error ha
From: "Charles (Chas) Williams" <3ch...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 16:28:25 -0400
> If netfront connects with two (or more) queues and then reconnects with
> only one queue it fails to delete or rewrite the multi-queue-num-queues
> key and netback will try to use the wrong number of queues.
This run is configured for baseline tests only.
flight 37992 ovmf real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/37992/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed
version targeted for testing:
ovmf 2f667c5488c81924861901d4d7c6f4bb170ffb69
baseline version:
ovm
MAINTAINERS: Update VT-x maintainers
Eddie will not act as a VT-x maintainer anymore. So remove
him from the list.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Tian
CC: Jun Nakajima
CC: Eddie Dong
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index a7fad84..4d0ffcf 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -198,7 +198,
Stefano,
I have two questions,
#1. Which qemu version is this igd stuff going into? 2.6?
#2. Is this igd stuff going into qemu-xen inside xen? Any plan to go
into xen 4.6?
Thanks
Tiejun
On 9/9/2015 1:21 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
The following changes since commit 8611280505119e296757a60
On Sep 20, 2015 5:15 PM, "Linus Torvalds" wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 5:02 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > This demotes an OOPS and likely panic due to a failed non-"safe" MSR
> > access to a WARN_ON_ONCE and a return of zero (in the RDMSR case).
> > We still write a pr_info entry unconditi
flight 62129 xen-4.2-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/62129/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
test-i386-i386-libvirt-vhd 17 guest-start/debian.repeat fail REGR. vs. 61955
test-amd64-amd64-xl-win7-a
On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 5:02 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> This demotes an OOPS and likely panic due to a failed non-"safe" MSR
> access to a WARN_ON_ONCE and a return of zero (in the RDMSR case).
> We still write a pr_info entry unconditionally for debugging.
No, this is wrong.
If you really wan
This demotes an OOPS and likely panic due to a failed non-"safe" MSR
access to a WARN_ON_ONCE and a return of zero (in the RDMSR case).
We still write a pr_info entry unconditionally for debugging.
To be clear, this type of failure should *not* happen. This patch
exists to minimize the chance of
This applies on top of my earlier paravirt MSR series.
Changes from v1:
- Return zero instead of poison on bad RDMSRs.
Andy Lutomirski (2):
x86/msr: Carry on after a non-"safe" MSR access fails without
!panic_on_oops
x86/msr: Set the return value to zero when native_rdmsr_safe fails
ar
This will cause unchecked native_rdmsr_safe failures to return
deterministic results.
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski
---
arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h | 5 -
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h
index 77d8b284e4a7..
This run is configured for baseline tests only.
flight 37988 linux-3.4 real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/37988/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-winxpsp3 9 windows-install
flight 62128 xen-4.3-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/62128/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-raw 9 debian-di-install fail REGR. vs. 60742
Tests which are f
branch xen-unstable
xen branch xen-unstable
job test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvh-intel
test xen-boot
Tree: linux git://xenbits.xen.org/linux-pvops.git
Tree: linuxfirmware git://xenbits.xen.org/osstest/linux-firmware.git
Tree: qemu git://xenbits.xen.org/staging/qemu-xen-unstable.git
Tree: qemuu git://git.qe
flight 62118 linux-3.16 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/62118/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 9 debian-hvm-install fail
in 61786 pass in 62118
test-amd64-a
This run is configured for baseline tests only.
flight 37987 linux-3.10 real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/37987/
Failures and problems with tests :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-wi
flight 62117 xen-4.4-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/62117/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-armhf-pvops 3 host-install(3) broken REGR. vs. 60727
test-amd64-i386-x
flight 62112 qemu-upstream-4.3-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/62112/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 15 guest-localmigrate.2 fail in 62045 pass
in 62112
test-amd64-
Hi Quan,
Thank you in advance.
I have set XSM_ENABLE ?=y in xen-4.3.0/Config.mk before install XEN.
I remove the vtpmmgr / vtpm disk and build it again. But the problem still
exists.
Here is vtpmmgr / vtpm instance log. (Including executing
tpm_takeownership in domU)
*vtpmmgr:*
Parsing co
This run is configured for baseline tests only.
flight 37986 linux-3.14 real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/37986/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-armhf-armhf-xl-midway 11 guest-start
flight 62110 linux-linus real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/62110/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2 6 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 59254
test-armhf-armhf-xl-c
This run is configured for baseline tests only.
flight 37985 linux-3.16 real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/37985/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd 9 redhat-inst
flight 62106 qemu-upstream-4.6-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/62106/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
test-armhf-armhf-xl-raw 3 host-install(3) broken in 62041 pass in 62106
test-armhf-armhf-xl-c
29 matches
Mail list logo
