Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 5/7] xenalyze: disable sched_switch_process

2015-05-02 Thread Wei Liu
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 07:58:44AM +0200, Olaf Hering wrote: > On Tue, Apr 28, Wei Liu wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 01:22:14PM +, Olaf Hering wrote: > > > It causes a crash, dump data and return early > > > This doesn't look right. You skip all things below. > > Yes, to avoid the cra

[Xen-devel] [qemu-upstream-4.5-testing test] 52973: regressions - FAIL

2015-05-02 Thread osstest service user
flight 52973 qemu-upstream-4.5-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/52973/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64-pvops 5 kernel-build fail in 52632 REGR. vs. 36517 build-a

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] hypervisor/x86/xen: Unset X86_BUG_SYSRET_SS_ATTRS on Xen PV guests

2015-05-02 Thread Sander Eikelenboom
Friday, May 1, 2015, 12:37:54 PM, you wrote: > On 30/04/15 20:08, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: >> Commit 61f01dd941ba ("x86_64, asm: Work around AMD SYSRET SS descriptor >> attribute issue") makes AMD processors set SS to __KERNEL_DS in >> __switch_to() to deal with cases when SS is NULL. >> >> This b

Re: [Xen-devel] [osstest test] 52908: regressions - FAIL [and 1 more messages]

2015-05-02 Thread Ian Jackson
Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [osstest test] 52908: regressions - FAIL"): > On Fri, 2015-05-01 at 23:13 +, osstest service user wrote: > > flight 52908 osstest real [real] > > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/52908/ Thanks for looking at this. > I suspect the first must be due to:

Re: [Xen-devel] [osstest test] 52908: regressions - FAIL

2015-05-02 Thread Ian Campbell
On Sat, 2015-05-02 at 09:51 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > I suspect the first must be due to: > 7413a71 ts-xen-*: Avoid use of uninitialised $r{"enable_xsm"} > since it touches ts-xen-install. I think perhaps I've gotten the > precedence of // vs =~ wrong. > > http://logs.test-lab.xenprojec

Re: [Xen-devel] [osstest test] 52908: regressions - FAIL

2015-05-02 Thread Ian Campbell
On Fri, 2015-05-01 at 23:13 +, osstest service user wrote: > flight 52908 osstest real [real] > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/52908/ > > Regressions :-( > > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, > including tests which could not be run: > test-armhf-armhf-xl-arndal

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 1/3] x86/hvm: give HVMOP_set_param and HVMOP_get_param their own functions

2015-05-02 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 01/05/15 20:19, Jan Beulich wrote: Paul Durrant 05/01/15 4:05 PM >>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c @@ -5638,6 +5638,299 @@ static int hvmop_set_evtchn_upcall_vector( return 0; } > +static int hvmop_set_param( +XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(xen_hvm_param_t) arg) +

[Xen-devel] [linux-3.16 test] 52945: regressions - trouble: broken/fail/pass

2015-05-02 Thread osstest service user
flight 52945 linux-3.16 real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/52945/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu 9 debian-install fail REGR. vs. 34167 test-amd64-i386-pair