flight 34907 xen-4.5-testing real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/34907/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvh-intel 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 34731
test-armhf-armhf-
flight 34901 qemu-upstream-unstable real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/34901/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd 6 leak-check/basis(6) running in 34247
[st=running!]
test-a
flight 34946 xen-4.3-testing real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/34946/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-xl-winxpsp3-vcpus1 5 xen-bootfail REGR. vs. 34190
build-armhf
flight 34877 linux-linus real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/34877/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-libvirt 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 34227
test-amd64-amd64-rump
flight 34811 linux-3.10 real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/34811/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-winxpsp3 7 windows-install fail REGR. vs. 26303
build-amd64-pvops
flight 34793 linux-3.16 real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/34793/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-credit2 15 guest-localmigrate/x10fail REGR. vs. 34167
test-amd64-i386-pair 1
Use u8-sized node IDs and unsigned PXMs consistently throughout
code (and introduce nodeid_t type).
Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky
---
xen/arch/x86/irq.c |4 +-
xen/arch/x86/numa.c | 15
xen/arch/x86/setup.c|2 +-
xen/arch/x86/s
On 02/21/15 10:40, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 21/02/15 13:36, Don Slutz wrote:
>> On 02/18/15 13:19, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> On 18/02/15 17:03, Don Slutz wrote:
On 02/17/15 09:38, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 16/02/15 23:05, Don Slutz wrote:
>> Summary is that VMware treats "in (%dx),%eax
Hi all,
This is for Xen 4.6: Enabling XL to set the parameters of each
individual VCPU of a domain for RTDS scheduler.
[Goal]
Right now, xl sched-rtds tool can only set the VCPUs of a domain to
the same parameter although the scheduler did support VCPUs with
different parameters. This work is to
On 21/02/15 13:36, Don Slutz wrote:
> On 02/18/15 13:19, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 18/02/15 17:03, Don Slutz wrote:
>>> On 02/17/15 09:38, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 16/02/15 23:05, Don Slutz wrote:
> Summary is that VMware treats "in (%dx),%eax" (or "out %eax,(%dx)")
> to port 0x5658 sp
I'd like to have below two commits in stable release - without them
libvirtd crashes while trying to start a HVM domain (with about 50%
probability on my system). I've tested this only on 4.4.1, but looks
like the same problem exists there since 4.2. I wonder why it wasn't
spotted earlier... Maybe
On 02/18/15 13:19, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 18/02/15 17:03, Don Slutz wrote:
>> On 02/17/15 09:38, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> On 16/02/15 23:05, Don Slutz wrote:
Summary is that VMware treats "in (%dx),%eax" (or "out %eax,(%dx)")
to port 0x5658 specially. Note: since many operations retur
flight 34756 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/34756/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 7 windows-install fail REGR. vs. 33480
test-amd64-i386-xl-
13 matches
Mail list logo
