Hello Folks.
Can anyone tell me why Xen use Ocaml language? what is the benefit of this
language and why it just not C and Python?
Cheers.
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
On 2015-02-05 01:56:04, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 4 February 2015 at 21:10, Jordan Justen wrote:
> > On 2015-02-03 11:20:06, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >> This patch adds support to XenBusDxe for executing on ARM and AArch64
> >> machines (the former only when built with GCC).
> >>
> >> Contributed-
flight 34227 linux-linus real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/34227/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
test-amd64-amd64-xl-pcipt-intel 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 33815
test-amd64-i386-libvirt
From: Tao Chen
Signed-off-by: Tao Chen
---
drivers/xen/xen-scsiback.c | 16
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/xen/xen-scsiback.c b/drivers/xen/xen-scsiback.c
index 3e32146..59f09fd 100644
--- a/drivers/xen/xen-scsiback.c
+++ b/drivers/xen/xen
Can anyone tell me why Citrix Developer choose Ocaml?
On Friday, February 6, 2015 12:02 PM, Razvan Cojocaru
wrote:
On 02/06/2015 09:17 PM, Jason Long wrote:
> I know my questions are silly but I'm a dummies and I looked at amazon.com
> and found Tons of C book but which one is good?
"The C P
flight 34214 libvirt real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/34214/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-i386-libvirt 10 migrate-support-checkfail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 10 migrate-sup
