>>> On 21.11.14 at 23:03, wrote:
> I rewrote it a bit to be more in the style of pciback:
>[...]
> [v2: Removed the switch statement, moved it about]
What you don't mention here is that you also removed the outer
loop, yet that breaks functionality afaict: There can (and I suppose
normally will)
> -Original Message-
> From: Boris Ostrovsky [mailto:boris.ostrov...@oracle.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 8:39 PM
> To: Hu, Robert; xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> Cc: jbeul...@suse.com
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [TestDay] VMX test report for Xen 4.5.0-rc1
>
>
> On 11/12/2014 01:58
flight 31801 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/31801/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 4 xen-install fail pass in 31768
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 5 x
flight 31771 linux-next real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/31771/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
test-amd64-amd64-rumpuserxen-amd64 8 guest-start fail baseline untested
test-amd64-i386-xl-credit2 12
flight 31764 xen-unstable real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/31764/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
test-amd64-i386-pair17 guest-migrate/src_host/dst_host fail like 31659
Tests which did not succeed,
When I try to use virtio on xen(HVM guest), qemu crashed. Here is the backtrace:
(gdb) bt
#0 0x7f49581f0b55 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#1 0x7f49581f2131 in abort () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#2 0x7f495af2af32 in xen_ram_addr_from_mapcache (ptr=0x7f4951858ac8) at
/root/work/xen/to
On 2014/11/23 18:10, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 05:49:13PM +0800, Tiejun Chen wrote:
v5:
* Simplify to make sure its really inherited from the standard one in patch #3
* Then drop the original patch #3
I carried
i440fx: make types configurable at run-time
flight 31795 linux-linus real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/31795/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-rumpuserxen-i386 8 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 31241
test-amd64-amd64-rump
On Sat, 22 Nov 2014, M A Young wrote:
While investigating a bug reported on Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166461
I discovered the following
xl migrate --debug domid localhost does indeed fail for Xen 4.4 pv (the bug
report is for Xen 4.3 hvm ) when xl migrate do
Hello all,
At the beginning of the year, I have sent a first RFC to add support for
FreeBSD on Xen ARM [1].
The first version was very primitive: hardcoded DTB, only single
user-mode support,...
Since then, I have improved the support and rebased everything on
master. Thanks for the FreeBS
flight 31781 xen-4.4-testing real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/31781/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-i386-rumpuserxen-i386 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-rumpuserxen-amd64
flight 31760 seabios real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/31760/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 31601
Regressions which are reg
flight 31787 libvirt real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/31787/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-armhf-libvirt 5 libvirt-build fail REGR. vs. 31680
Tests which did not succe
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 02:57:14PM -0600, Dr. Greg Wettstein wrote:
> Hi, hope the week is ending well for everyone.
>
> As readers of the list may remember we've kept the ATI primary adapter
> passthrough patches current for qemu-traditional on Xen for a number
> of years. Our 'run-passthrough'
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 04:05:48PM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 03:02:33PM -0600, Dr. Greg Wettstein wrote:
> > On Nov 21, 2:57pm, "Dr. Greg Wettstein" wrote:
> > } Subject: [Xen-devel] Q77 IGD instantly crashes on xen-pciback bind.
> >
> > > Hi, hope the week is ending
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 03:02:33PM -0600, Dr. Greg Wettstein wrote:
> On Nov 21, 2:57pm, "Dr. Greg Wettstein" wrote:
> } Subject: [Xen-devel] Q77 IGD instantly crashes on xen-pciback bind.
>
> > Hi, hope the week is ending well for everyone.
>
> As I was walking out the door I remembered I had b
flight 31779 qemu-upstream-unstable real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/31779/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-pair 17 guest-migrate/src_host/dst_host fail REGR. vs. 31647
Tests whic
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 05:49:13PM +0800, Tiejun Chen wrote:
> v5:
>
> * Simplify to make sure its really inherited from the standard one in patch #3
> * Then drop the original patch #3
I carried
i440fx: make types configurable at run-time
pc_init1: pass parameters just with types
18 matches
Mail list logo
