Re: [wxCode-users] Updating wxCode bakefiles

2006-08-30 Thread Francesco Montorsi
John Labenski ha scritto: > I've added quite a few more comments to the > wxCode/bakefiles/empty.bkl.template file to (hopefully) make it easier > to understand. Please let me know if what I've written doesn't make > sense or if there are other items that should be clarified. Thanks! I've checked i

[wxCode-users] SVN poll again

2006-08-30 Thread Francesco Montorsi
Hi all, some time has passed since the last poll, so I'd like to know if anyone has changed idea about this. To summarize: 1) I can grant SVN is easy to learn specially for those who use CVS. Basically all you need to know (at least for basic usage) is: a) unlike CVS it uses a single numb

Re: [wxCode-users] SVN poll again

2006-08-30 Thread cecilio
Hi all, > 6) last time there were: > > 3 pro: me, Angelo and Cecilio > 2 against: John, Otto > 2 undecided: Ulrich, Joseph > > Anyone changed his mind ? I would prefer SVN, but my usage of either CVS / SVN will be minimal. So I would prefer to abstent in this votation. I will accept a

Re: [wxCode-users] SVN poll again

2006-08-30 Thread John Labenski
On 8/30/06, cecilio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > > > 6) last time there were: > > > > 3 pro: me, Angelo and Cecilio > > 2 against: John, Otto > > 2 undecided: Ulrich, Joseph > > > > Anyone changed his mind ? > I would prefer SVN, but my usage of either CVS / SVN will be mini

Re: [wxCode-users] SVN poll again

2006-08-30 Thread Otto Wyss
Anyone changed his mind ? Not me, I stick to CVS. O. Wyss - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download I

Re: [wxCode-users] SVN poll again

2006-08-30 Thread Francesco Montorsi
Otto Wyss ha scritto: > Anyone changed his mind ? > > > Not me, I stick to CVS. but would you accept to have CVS+SVN repo enabled for wxCode? They could cohexist... Francesco - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to s

Re: [wxCode-users] SVN poll again

2006-08-30 Thread Angelo Mandato
I like the idea of using SVN.  It seems easier to setup and use.Every time I setup a new computer I spend hours reconfiguring CVS, you almost need to be an expert with it to get it working.  We would see a lot more people contributing code if the revision check in/out process was easier.  I think S

Re: [wxCode-users] SVN poll again

2006-08-30 Thread Otto Wyss
Francesco Montorsi wrote: > Otto Wyss ha scritto: > >> Anyone changed his mind ? >> >> >> Not me, I stick to CVS. >> > but would you accept to have CVS+SVN repo enabled for wxCode? > > > Yes of course. O. Wyss - U

[wxCode-users] components to put in SVN repo

2006-08-30 Thread Francesco Montorsi
Hi all, to me it seems that I can begin to setup SVN repo. Before uploading contents to it however, I'd like to know which components are willing to use it (and thus be removed from CVS). Note that all revision history will be preserved (in SVN). I'm going to put in SVN the following compone

Re: [wxCode-users] components to put in SVN repo

2006-08-30 Thread Otto Wyss
Francesco Montorsi wrote: > Also, looking at CVS I see that the hyperlink component is there - Otto, > I guess you know that I merged it with Ryan's implementation and already > submitted in to wxWidgets HEAD (and it's already part of wx) - so maybe > we can remove it from CVS, too ? > > I'll

Re: [wxCode-users] components to put in SVN repo

2006-08-30 Thread Francesco Montorsi
Otto Wyss ha scritto: > Francesco Montorsi wrote: >> Also, looking at CVS I see that the hyperlink component is there - Otto, >> I guess you know that I merged it with Ryan's implementation and already >> submitted in to wxWidgets HEAD (and it's already part of wx) - so maybe >> we can remove it

Re: [wxCode-users] components to put in SVN repo

2006-08-30 Thread cecilio
>Before uploading contents to it however, I'd like to know which >components are willing to use it (and thus be removed from CVS). Note >that all revision history will be preserved (in SVN). I will move wxMidi to SVN. But I'm living from vacation tomorrow morning, so I will not do anything it in a

Re: [wxCode-users] components to put in SVN repo

2006-08-30 Thread Otto Wyss
Francesco Montorsi wrote: > While we are on it: I read on wx-users some time ago that someone > extended wxTreeListCtrl with a native wxMSW implementation. This makes > it eligible for integration in wx: in fact, if you would make a patch > containing the generic version and the wxMSW version I'

Re: [wxCode-users] components to put in SVN repo

2006-08-30 Thread Angelo Mandato
Awesome!  Renaming wxhttpengine to httpengine in SVN sounds good.Thanks,angeloOn 8/30/06, Francesco Montorsi < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Hi all,   to me it seems that I can begin to setup SVN repo. Before uploading contents to it however, I'd like to know whichcomponents are willing to use it (and t

Re: [wxCode-users] Updating wxCode bakefiles

2006-08-30 Thread John Labenski
Thanks, I'll try to test it as soon as I get a chance. -John Labenski On 8/30/06, Francesco Montorsi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > John Labenski ha scritto: > > I've added quite a few more comments to the > > wxCode/bakefiles/empty.bkl.template file to (hopefully) make it easier > > to understa

Re: [wxCode-users] SVN poll again

2006-08-30 Thread Ernesto Rangel Dallet
I would like to see wxCode switch to SVN very much. So my vote is "YES" go for SVN __ Correo Yahoo! Espacio para todos tus mensajes, antivirus y antispam ¡gratis! Regístrate ya - http://correo.yahoo.com.mx/

Re: [wxCode-users] components to put in SVN repo

2006-08-30 Thread Ernesto Rangel Dallet
Francesco Montorsi escribió: > Hi all, >to me it seems that I can begin to setup SVN repo. > > Before uploading contents to it however, I'd like to know which > components are willing to use it (and thus be removed from CVS). Note > that all revision history will be preserved (in SVN). > >

Re: [wxCode-users] Updating wxCode bakefiles

2006-08-30 Thread John Labenski
On 8/30/06, John Labenski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks! I've checked it and found no errors except for the use of -- > > string as separator (which is not allowed within an XML file); I > > replaced them with ~~ Oops, I just got bakefile working in linux so I can test things now. I dunno