upgrade53.html suggestion.

2013-04-04 Thread Remco
Does this make sense ? Take the first paragraph in section "Final steps": - remove the last two words "sysmerge(8) process." which seem out-of-place - mentions both the etc53.tgz and xetc53.tgz sets - Move the whole thing into step 1 as the first paragraph since this text only seems to apply to t

Re: upgrade53.html suggestion.

2013-04-04 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2013/04/04 14:52, Remco wrote: > Does this make sense ? > > Take the first paragraph in section "Final steps": > - remove the last two words "sysmerge(8) process." which seem out-of-place > - mentions both the etc53.tgz and xetc53.tgz sets > - Move the whole thing into step 1 as the first parag

Re: upgrade53.html suggestion.

2013-04-04 Thread Remco
On Thursday 04 April 2013 14:56:05 you wrote: > On 2013-04-04 8:52 AM, Remco wrote: > > Does this make sense ? > > > > > > > > 1. Merging locally changed files via sysmerge(8) > > I'm not speaking for the group, but maybe it's where it is because it > also merges > files that were upgraded

Re: upgrade53.html suggestion.

2013-04-04 Thread Remco
On Thursday 04 April 2013 15:10:13 Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2013/04/04 14:52, Remco wrote: > > Does this make sense ? > > > > Take the first paragraph in section "Final steps": > > - remove the last two words "sysmerge(8) process." which seem > > out-of-place - mentions both the etc53.tgz and x