Re: WSS-148 WCF interop issue: Namespace not honored incase of attributes.

2009-05-29 Thread Marc Tremblay
Interesting. Not what I'd expect, but I'm sure there's a reason for it. It's really too bad then that for having been involved in drafting the UsernameToken Profile 1.1 spec that MS would mess up their implementation in WCF. So what would make the most sense as an approach to accommodate the qua

RE: WSS-148 WCF interop issue: Namespace not honored incase of attributes.

2009-05-29 Thread George Stanchev
It is not redundant. Read the XML specs. Password is an element. While non-qualified subelements of a qualified element do inherit the qualified's parent namespace, this is not true for attributes. Attributes that are not explictly namespace-qualified do not inherit automatically the namespace of t

Re: WSS-148 WCF interop issue: Namespace not honored incase of attributes.

2009-05-29 Thread Marc Tremblay
I agree that's how the spec is written, but qualifying Type with the same namespace as Password, while redundant, doesn't change the semantics as far as XML is concerned. As the spec doesn't specifically forbid namespace qualifying Type, I would expect non-qualified and redundantly qualified forms

RE: WSS-148 WCF interop issue: Namespace not honored incase of attributes.

2009-05-29 Thread George Stanchev
>From the specs: line 239: /wsse:UsernameToken/wsse:Password/@Type The Type attribute is clearly not namespaced. If it were WSS namespaced, then the line above should have been /wsse:UsernameToken/wsse:Password/@wsse:Type, but its not. For reference look at line 328 in the spec and you will see

WSS-148 WCF interop issue: Namespace not honored incase of attributes.

2009-05-29 Thread Marc Tremblay
Hello, I have recently encountered the issue described at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WSS-148 and am wondering if it doesn't make sense to allow for the Type attribute to be namespace qualified. I've examined Page 8 of the Web Services Security, UsernameToken Profile 1.1 spec and while

Re: Equivalent client.wsdd for the WSE3POLICYCACHE.config file of WSE3

2009-05-29 Thread Wishing Carebear
Hello: Can someone give some pointers. Or should I post this to a different wss4j group. Please let me know as this is very urgent. Thanks for your time and help, Regards, cabear On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Wishing Carebear < wishing.careb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello: > I'm using wss4j wit

[jira] Resolved: (WSS-191) Move certificate validation our of WSHandler and into SignatureProcessor

2009-05-29 Thread Colm O hEigeartaigh (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WSS-191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Colm O hEigeartaigh resolved WSS-191. - Resolution: Fixed > Move certificate validation our of WSHandler and into SignatureProcessor

[jira] Closed: (WSS-191) Move certificate validation our of WSHandler and into SignatureProcessor

2009-05-29 Thread Colm O hEigeartaigh (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WSS-191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Colm O hEigeartaigh closed WSS-191. --- > Move certificate validation our of WSHandler and into SignatureProcessor > ---

svn commit: r779937 - in /webservices/wss4j/trunk: ./ src/org/apache/ws/axis/security/ src/org/apache/ws/security/handler/ src/org/apache/ws/security/message/token/ src/org/apache/ws/security/processo

2009-05-29 Thread coheigea
Author: coheigea Date: Fri May 29 11:51:38 2009 New Revision: 779937 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=779937&view=rev Log: [WSS-191] - Moved trust verification from WSHandler to SignatureProcessor - Trust is now verified on certificates *before* signature validation - This means that bad re