On Monday 23 August 2004 14:02, Victor STINNER wrote:
> Le lun 23/08/2004 à 13:56, Isaac Clerencia a écrit :
> > On Monday 23 August 2004 01:14, Victor STINNER wrote:
> > > Someone hate autotools ?
> >
> > I've almost finished the work, I hate autotools, but they are great when
> > they already wor
Le lun 23/08/2004 à 13:56, Isaac Clerencia a écrit :
> On Monday 23 August 2004 01:14, Victor STINNER wrote:
> > Someone hate autotools ?
>
> I've almost finished the work, I hate autotools, but they are great when they
> already work ;)
:-D Don't forget to explain scripts because I think that n
On Monday 23 August 2004 01:14, Victor STINNER wrote:
> Someone hate autotools ?
I've almost finished the work, I hate autotools, but they are great when they
already work ;)
pgpeY1E7A3uIt.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
Le lun 23/08/2004 à 00:50, Isaac Clerencia a écrit :
> I already proposed it some time ago. In fact, I even volunteered to do it,
> but I got a very unpleasant answer :(
You speak about Toddd answer, I think :
> And I am very happy with the makefile and DON'T want autoconf...
I'm not sure th
On Monday 23 August 2004 00:50, Isaac Clerencia wrote:
> I already proposed it some time ago. In fact, I even volunteered to do it,
> but I got a very unpleasant answer :(
I've just got latest CVS, I will sent patches as soon as I've
autoconf/automake working.
Best regards
pgpoNitz90Wgs.pgp
De
On Monday 23 August 2004 00:40, Victor STINNER wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Last July, Mickael wrote :
> > As a sidenote: I think you could save a lot of
> > work by switching to GNU automake.
>
> So, is someone intested to do this ?
I already proposed it some time ago. In fact, I even volunteered to do it,
bu
