Hi,
just a few word to say that I have tried to implement such a class, but
I have currently failed to have something working. There are lot of
implicit cast to int, and that leads to ambiguity between operators
acting on int and those actinng on UnsignedInt. I will continue to try
but not too
Hi,
Le 07.02.2010 19:04, Florian Köberle a écrit :
> Hello gentildemon
>
> I too have thought about doing something against the unsigned integers
> in wormux.
> Unsigned integers in C++ are a bad thing in my opinion for the following
> reasons:
> 1. They overflow easily.
> 2. Their overflow behavi
Le 07.02.2010 18:45, Julien PUYDT a écrit :
> Matthieu Fertré a écrit :
>
>> I'm quite fed up with integer overflow/wrap. Unsigned integers in
>> particular are particularly dangerous [1]. Last week, I have again fixed
>> a bug related to unsigned int wrap (uint length = 0 - 4, the result of
Hello gentildemon
I too have thought about doing something against the unsigned integers
in wormux.
Unsigned integers in C++ are a bad thing in my opinion for the following
reasons:
1. They overflow easily.
2. Their overflow behaviour is not defined: Different compilers or
different optimization f
Matthieu Fertré a écrit :
> I'm quite fed up with integer overflow/wrap. Unsigned integers in
> particular are particularly dangerous [1]. Last week, I have again fixed
> a bug related to unsigned int wrap (uint length = 0 - 4, the result of
> this operation gives a very big number, not zero nor
