> Every packager, please hold on.
>
> The file didn't match its signature file (just a file overwritten), so
> I'm in the process of rebuilding one. Expect it in at best 30 minutes,
> and without signature, for lack of gpg-fu.
The package is now ok, as it has been confirmed to work by the Windo
Kurosu a écrit :
> Kurosu a écrit :
>> I don't know if and why I could be responsible for this, so I'll let
>> others (the uploadeder?) do what's required (upload a gpg pkey?).
Every packager, please hold on.
The file didn't match its signature file (just a file overwritten), so
I'm in the proc
Kurosu a écrit :
> I don't know if and why I could be responsible for this, so I'll let
> others (the uploadeder?) do what's required (upload a gpg pkey?).
Strange, from the FAQ:
https://gna.org/cookbook/?func=detailitem&item_id=116
But why is it the only file without a .sig that seems corrupted
> These files were moved in subdirectories called /maybe-corrupted.
>
> Please check these files:
> wormux-0.8beta2.tar.bz2
This explains why I was unable to get this file. The moved file unpacked
correctly.
I don't know if and why I could be responsible for this, so I'll let
others (the uplo
