oznog a écrit :
> Well I can see a malloc but not a free, Is that normal ?
For the record, my reply over IRC: I'm not changing the logic, the
malloc had always been there. Probably Network is free'ing it.
Kurosu
___
Wormux-dev mailing list
Wormux-dev
Le Sat, 16 Jun 2007 20:43:40 +0200,
Kurosu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> Kurosu a écrit :
> [...]
>
> And once again, patch swallowed by the mailing list. Please find that
> patch here:
> http://kurosu.free.fr/action.diff
>
Well I can see a malloc but not a free, Is that normal ?
--
QFDQF
__
Kurosu a écrit :
[...]
And once again, patch swallowed by the mailing list. Please find that
patch here:
http://kurosu.free.fr/action.diff
Kurosu
___
Wormux-dev mailing list
Wormux-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wormux-dev
Hello,
I'm not sure if the compiler would really make a copy of the object when
those functions are called, but as the Action objects can be const when
used these members are used, a small optimization was possible.
I also added newer functions (getting the packet size, and writing to an
already