Re: [WiX-users] wix and the preprocessor...

2008-03-19 Thread Jordan Fitzgibbon
based on the variables set. thanks again. should i write this up as a preprocessor defect or was the intention of the preprocessor to ever work this way? ~Jeremy ____________________________ Subject: RE: [WiX-users] wix and the preprocessor... Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 12:24:47 -0400 From: [EMAIL

Re: [WiX-users] wix and the preprocessor...

2008-03-19 Thread Richard.Foster
"that's how it works". :-) Regards, Richard From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeremy Breiding Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 12:33 PM To: Foster, Richard - PAL Cc: wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [WiX-users] wix

Re: [WiX-users] wix and the preprocessor...

2008-03-19 Thread Jeremy Breiding
this up as a preprocessor defect or was the intention of the preprocessor to ever work this way?~Jeremy Subject: RE: [WiX-users] wix and the preprocessor...Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 12:24:47 -0400From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net Jeremy, Just for

Re: [WiX-users] wix and the preprocessor...

2008-03-19 Thread Richard.Foster
Jeremy, Just for stupidity's sake, is everything OK if you reverse the order of the second test? I.e. the second test would become: Unless I'm missing something, the file would then be "valid" again, since the product element is opened before the module element could possibly b