Re: [WiX-users] ps:SnapIn

2008-08-11 Thread Christopher Karper
As long as your entire organization is using Wix to build their deployments. Chris On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 1:22 AM, Blair Murri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't know if anyone has mentioned this already, but the Windows > Installer team has been trying to deprecate Merge Modules almost ever

Re: [WiX-users] ps:SnapIn

2008-08-10 Thread Blair Murri
I don't know if anyone has mentioned this already, but the Windows Installer team has been trying to deprecate Merge Modules almost ever since they created them. If you don't have to distribute your merge modules to external customers, you should consider using WixLibs instead of Merge Modules.

Re: [WiX-users] ps:SnapIn

2008-08-05 Thread Christopher Karper
No.. That would be normal. http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2034934&group_id=105970&atid=642714 You need to add the Module GUID to the file ID. Wix does a lot of nice things for us, including handling the ID redirection that occurs with modularization. When you refer to

Re: [WiX-users] ps:SnapIn

2008-08-05 Thread Cristian Libardo
Thank you. I'm just about to read up on modularization. Do you mean something like this?: wrote: > You're probably facing the same issue I did.. There's currently a bug that > binder variables need the fully modularized id in merge modules. I don't > know if there's a way to pass this in to Sn

Re: [WiX-users] ps:SnapIn

2008-08-05 Thread Christopher Karper
You're probably facing the same issue I did.. There's currently a bug that binder variables need the fully modularized id in merge modules. I don't know if there's a way to pass this in to SnapIn extension, but you can try modularizing the file key yourself as a workaround. Chris On Tue, Aug 5,