Moradi, Ari wrote:
> I understand your point. However, I think that the DIFx merge module
> dependency is a good way to go, because right now, it is not possible to
> build two different merge modules using DIFxAppExtension and then include
> them both in the same MSI. Any good solution to tha
toolset.
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] WixDIFxAppExtension and MergeModules
... but that's one of the issues that I'm dealing with -- I can't guarantee
everyone is using WiX :)
And I kindof think that if WiX is building a merge module, it wouldn't be
unreasonable to assume that who
10:23 PM
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] WixDIFxAppExtension and MergeModules
Moradi, Ari wrote:
> There isn't a DIFxApp merge module in WiX, but there is one in the WDK. WiX
> can certainly add a dependency on a merge module that
Moradi, Ari wrote:
> There isn't a DIFxApp merge module in WiX, but there is one in the WDK. WiX
> can certainly add a dependency on a merge module that isn't shipped with WiX.
You're suggesting WixDifxAppExtension should use the WDK merge modules?
Interesting, assuming the merge modules are we
n for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] WixDIFxAppExtension and MergeModules
There actually are differences in the rows, since the binary table entries that
get added to the merge module get the merge module ID appended to them.
As a test, I manually modified the Binary table en
components directly to your own merge
module, right?
-Ari
-Original Message-
From: Bob Arnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 5:18 PM
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] WixDIFxAppExtension and MergeModules
Mo
Moradi, Ari wrote:
> I still think that the solution of creating a dependency on the DIFxApp merge
> module instead of including the DIFxApp wixlib in the merge module is a
> better solution... What do you think?
>
There is no DifxApp merge module in WiX. WixDifxAppExtension always
creates
Rob Mensching [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 5:53 PM
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] WixDIFxAppExtension and MergeModules
Hmm, that really surprises me. I thought that mergemod.dll was smarter than
that. There are no di
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 5:53 PM
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] WixDIFxAppExtension and MergeModules
Hmm, that really surprises me. I thought that mergemod.dll was smarter than
that. There are no differences
discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] WixDIFxAppExtension and MergeModules
Mergemod.dll doesn't like trying to merge rows with identical primary keys
(even if they are really supposed to be the same thing. Here's some log output
since you asked for it :)
I crea
icts: 7
Closed Merge Module.
> Warning: Changes were not saved to MSI Database.
Closed MSI Database.
-Ari
-Original Message-
From: Rob Mensching [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008 1:32 PM
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re:
If the rows are duplicate, I thought mergemod.dll would let them through. Is
it more accurate to say that the DIFxApp actions Id's have been modularized and
that is colliding?
Can you maybe share out a merge.log that shows the merge problems?
-Original Message-
From: Moradi, Ari [mailt
12 matches
Mail list logo
