I'd actually prefer this, as it would make writing plugins and extensions that much simpler for me.In fact, at this stage I am compiling the WiX cvs sources in .NET 2.0 locally in any case, in order to take advantage of some extensions and tweaks I added...
On 6/19/06, Thomas Hecker <[EMAIL PROTECT
No problem with this. I would have to install it, but that's all.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/RFC%3A-Moving-Wix-3.0-to-use-the-.NET-Framework-2.0-t1788371.html#a4932005
Sent from the wix-users forum at Nabble.com.
___
WiX-
I don't see any problems with this; most of our
environments are running VS 2005 or is a Windows 2003 Server as compileserver,
on which .NET 2.0 is installed for various uses.
And i suppose you should think about future development
possibilities in new environments such as .NET 2.0 whenever
We have no plans to use
WiX v3.0 for production until next year. It won’t affect us if you switch
to v2.0 now. When we switch to WiX v3.0 it won’t be a problem to switch
to .Net 2.0 at the same time.
IMHO WiX 3.0 is not
production-ready anyway, but the closer you get to finish it, the
open for more feedback.
Justin
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John
Lemire
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 8:30 AM
To: wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] RFC: Moving Wix 3.0 to use the .NET Framework
2.0
I think it’s very nice
I think it’s very nice that candle/light/etc
now run on either.
We too develop apps that must run on
either so we have some dev boxes that only have 1.1 on them.
Naturally this includes the automated build
servers which only have 1.1 and VS2003 on them to ensure no code references 2.0
cla
Hi
Since we are using Visual Studio 2005 the .NET Framework 2.0 is
automaticaly installed. So there will be no problem for us.
Stefan
Justin Rockwood wrote:
> There has been some talk on the core team about moving Wix 3.0 over to use
> the .NET Framework 2.0 instead of 1.1. We wanted to know how
7 matches
Mail list logo
