Re: [WiX-users] Install .Net COM+ without .TLB

2006-12-20 Thread Alexander Biryukov
Maybe you confuse COM with COM+ ? If you installing COM+, than why you do't use standart Wix CA (ComPlusApplication element) ? -- Alexander Biryukov On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 20:27:54 +0300, Christer Solskogen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 15:29:41 +0300 > "Alexander Biryukov"

Re: [WiX-users] Install .Net COM+ without .TLB

2006-12-20 Thread Fredrik Grohn
: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 6:28 PM To: wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [WiX-users] Install .Net COM+ without .TLB On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 15:29:41 +0300 "Alexander Biryukov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Wix COM+ CA (pcaexec) does not allow to install COM+ .Net assem

Re: [WiX-users] Install .Net COM+ without .TLB

2006-12-20 Thread Christer Solskogen
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 15:29:41 +0300 "Alexander Biryukov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Wix COM+ CA (pcaexec) does not allow to install COM+ .Net assembly > without TLB file, but basically it possible. > Okay, I'm having a hard time installing a COM+ .Net assembly *with* a TLB file (Take a look

Re: [WiX-users] Install .Net COM+ without .TLB

2006-12-19 Thread Alexander Biryukov
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 22:06:53 +0300, Fredrik Grohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The reason the TLB is required for .NET assemblies is because the TLB is > an > installed resource that would need to be tracked in case you let > RegistrationHelper create it. The file would for instance be left be

Re: [WiX-users] Install .Net COM+ without .TLB

2006-12-19 Thread Fredrik Grohn
The reason the TLB is required for .NET assemblies is because the TLB is an installed resource that would need to be tracked in case you let RegistrationHelper create it. The file would for instance be left behind on the system if you don't explicitly remove it when the component is removed. Also I