Re: [WiX-users] Heat and GUIDs

2009-10-20 Thread Blair
s > based on the box it is built on. That would appear to be a bug. The > algorithm (including the hash methodology) is supposed to be stable without > any box-to-box differences. > > -Original Message- > From: little.forest [mailto:little.for...@ymail.com] > Sent: Tuesd

Re: [WiX-users] Heat and GUIDs

2009-10-20 Thread Daniel Hughes
luding the hash methodology) is supposed to be stable without > any box-to-box differences. > > -Original Message- > From: little.forest [mailto:little.for...@ymail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2009 4:20 PM > To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.

Re: [WiX-users] Heat and GUIDs

2009-10-20 Thread Blair
s. -Original Message- From: little.forest [mailto:little.for...@ymail.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2009 4:20 PM To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset. Subject: Re: [WiX-users] Heat and GUIDs I also run into a GUID and "*" related issue: I have all of the c

Re: [WiX-users] Heat and GUIDs

2009-10-20 Thread little.forest
General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset. Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2009 4:05:13 PM Subject: Re: [WiX-users] Heat and GUIDs the help about -ag says: "autogenerate component guids at compile time" I assumed this would mean that each time it is compiled a new guid was gene

Re: [WiX-users] Heat and GUIDs

2009-10-20 Thread Daniel Hughes
the help about -ag says: "autogenerate component guids at compile time" I assumed this would mean that each time it is compiled a new guid was generated. If in fact the guid is static as you say, it must be recorded somewhere (all the file has in it is "*"), ie wix would have to know what guid

Re: [WiX-users] Heat and GUIDs

2009-10-20 Thread Brian Rogers
Hey Daniel, Are you sure you are getting NEW GUIDs when using the "*" (-ag switch in heat.exe)? These should actually be static. Thanks, Brian Rogers "Intelligence removes complexity." - Me http://blogs.msdn.com/icumove <-- NEW On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Daniel Hughes wrote: > If I use