Tony Hoyle wrote:
> Not without the admin disabling UAC, no.
>
> If an installer could silently give itself admin rights there would be
> little point in UAC at all!!
>
And if you use /qn, you're explicitly asking for no user
interface/interaction; throwing up a modal prompt counts as UI, I'd
The flip side is that there is very little use to a fully silent install if an
interactive step is needed to invoke it.
Tony Hoyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Vincent Ho wrote:
> In Windows XP, the silent install works with no problems. Is there a way to
> grant credentials for silent ins
This is a known issue with UAC in Vista. You can choose to do a /QB for brief
instead of fully silent and then you'll actually see/aprove the eleveation
request. Otherwise the reccomendation is that you run the package from an
elevated process ( such as using a tool like SMS 2003 ) as to avoid
Vincent Ho wrote:
> In Windows XP, the silent install works with no problems. Is there a way to
> grant credentials for silent installs within Vista?
>
Not without the admin disabling UAC, no.
If an installer could silently give itself admin rights there would be
little point in UAC at all!!
To
4 matches
Mail list logo
