On 17-Jan-12 17:16, Peter Hull wrote:
> I'd still like to hear if anyone has any comments on a per-user
> install which includes a device driver - is it always better to do it
> per-machine.
Drivers are per-machine resources so a per-user installer that includes
one can't offer the benefits of
chine only to avoid confusion.
James
-Original Message-
From: Peter Hull [mailto:peterhul...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 22:17
To: WiX Users
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] difx extension and perMachine installs
> If the driver is not signed, and you say it is not, then yo
> If the driver is not signed, and you say it is not, then you need the Legacy
> option. I did say that; what I meant was "not signed with a certificate from
> a CA." It is self-signed at the moment. Apologies for the confusion.
I'd still like to hear if anyone has any comments on a per-user inst
James
-Original Message-
From: Peter Hull [mailto:peterhul...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2012 22:21
To: WiX Users
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] difx extension and perMachine installs
Thanks James, good point.
The driver will be signed for production; it just isn't at the moment
ing something and
the install won't fail in the field, and you guys are the experts!
ThanksPete
> From: johnst...@inn-soft.com
> To: wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 19:29:41 +0000
> Subject: Re: [WiX-users] dif
and driver packages with missing files"
Also see http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff547653(VS.85).aspx for
more info on what legacy mode is.
James
-Original Message-
From: Peter Hull [mailto:peterhul...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2012 14:59
To: WiX Users
Subject:
I am building an installer with a device driver, to be installed with the WiX
difx extension. The driver is self-signed for testing purposes. I set my
element to
and everything seemed fine. However I reasoned that a device driver had better
be perMachine so I changed the InstallScope to per
7 matches
Mail list logo
