In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Bob Lim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thanks everyone for reading and Richard for helping.
I'm glad you got it figured out. Usually upgrade problems can be
diagnosed by reading the verbose log carefully. The SDK ships with a
log reading utility that makes i
Lim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Bob Lim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [WiX-users] Upgrade MSI not replacing the old dlls
> To: "General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset."
>
> Date: Monday, 3 November, 2008, 12:53 PM
> Hi all,
&g
the new dlls which are 1.0.0.2.
Any ideas?
Thanks!
Best regards,
Bob Lim
--- On Mon, 3/11/08, Bob Lim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Bob Lim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [WiX-users] Upgrade MSI not replacing the old dlls
> To: "General discussion for Window
n remained
unchanged, there's why it won't be upgraded. So I can resolve the third dll
issue myself. What about the other 2 .Net dlls?
Please help.
Thank you!
Best regards,
Bob Lim
--- On Mon, 3/11/08, Richard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Richard <[EMAIL PROTE
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Bob Lim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am doing a minor upgrade with "REINSTALL=ALL REINSTALLMODE=vomus"
> which suc ceeded and the installer title is updated in Add/Remove Programs
> but I found th at the dlls in the installed directory is still dated 31
> O
Dear guys,
I am doing a minor upgrade with "REINSTALL=ALL REINSTALLMODE=vomus" which
succeeded and the installer title is updated in Add/Remove Programs but I found
that the dlls in the installed directory is still dated 31 Oct and their file
sizes are still the same, whereas my new dlls are da
6 matches
Mail list logo