age
> From: "Barneck, Jared"
> To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
>
> Sent: Thu, October 28, 2010 7:46:03 AM
> Subject: Re: [WiX-users] To beta or not to beta
>
> No, I meant that the Visual Studio 2010 MSI contains dlls from WIX 3.5
&
ering Blog
Have a hot tip, know a secret or read a really good thread that deserves
attention? E-Mail Me
- Original Message
From: "Barneck, Jared"
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Sent: Thu, October 28, 2010 7:46:03 AM
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] To b
2010.
From: Pally Sandher [pally.sand...@iesve.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 4:04 AM
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] To beta or not to beta
WiX v3.5 isn't technically more stable than WiX v3.0 (in development
-Original Message-
From: Barneck, Jared [mailto:jared.barn...@landesk.com]
Sent: 27 October 2010 21:45
To: wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] To beta or not to beta
Hey all,
So if I have a new project to do in WIX, and I can use either Visual
Studio 2008 or 2010.
I
Hey all,
So if I have a new project to do in WIX, and I can use either Visual Studio
2008 or 2010.
I know 3.5 says beta. But would you think there are more bugs fixed in 3.5 or
3.0? Which do you really think is more stable?
Is anyone already shipping production code with 3.5?
Thanks,
Jared
Hey all,
So if I have a new project to do in WIX, and I can use either Visual Studio
2008 or 2010.
I know 3.5 says beta. But would you think there are more bugs fixed in 3.5 or
3.0? Which do you really think is more stable?
Is anyone already shipping production code with 3.5?
Thanks,
Jared
6 matches
Mail list logo
